Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-mwc-random.spec SRPM link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-mwc-random.spec ghc-mwc-random.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mersenne -> Mennen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-mwc-random.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mersenne -> Mennen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-mwc-random-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mersenne -> Mennen The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
I think it is better not to indent the description. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3528845
Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output [1] ghc-mwc-random.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mersenne -> Mennen 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-mwc-random.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mersenne -> Mennen 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-mwc-random-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mersenne -> Mennen 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [+] MUST: package named according to Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [2] [+] MUST: meet Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: Fedora approved license and Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [3] [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [4] [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English [5] and legible. [6] [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release (from upstream URL) 1eb10b9bb760e587a4827cf8e4309ce3 mwc-random-0.10.0.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: successfully compile and build into binary rpms on a primary arch [7] [NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [8] [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [9] [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [11] [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [12] [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [13] [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [14] [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [15] [+] MUST: consistently use macros [16] [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [18] [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [18] [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [21] [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [20] [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [22] [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [23] [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24] SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If upstream source does not include license text file(s), the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [25] [NA] SHOULD: include description and summary translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [26] [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [27] [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [28] [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [29] Package is APPROVED. You can normalize the indentation of the description before building please.
>You can normalize the indentation of the description before building please. Yes. Will do that. Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-mwc-random Short Description: Pseudo random number generation library for Haskell Owners: narasim Branches: f16 f15 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc15
ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc16
ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.
ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
ghc-mwc-random-0.10.0.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.