RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 758590 - domblklist will returen non zero value when everything is ok
Summary: domblklist will returen non zero value when everything is ok
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libvirt
Version: 6.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Alex Jia
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-11-30 07:09 UTC by weizhang
Modified: 2013-03-22 08:36 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libvirt-0.9.9-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 06:37:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0748 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: libvirt security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2012-06-19 19:31:38 UTC

Description weizhang 2011-11-30 07:09:35 UTC
Description of problem:
virsh command domblklist will return 1 when do
# virsh domblklist kvm-rhel6u2-x86_64
Target     Source
------------------------------------------------
hda        /var/lib/libvirt/images/kvm-rhel6u2-x86_64.img

# echo $?
1
but seems that everything is ok and no error report 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libvirt-0.9.4-23.el6.x86_64
kernel-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.209.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. # virsh domblklist guest
2. # echo $?

  
Actual results:
return 1

Expected results:
return 0

Additional info:

Comment 2 Alex Jia 2011-11-30 08:26:00 UTC
Patch for upstream:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-November/msg01762.html

Comment 3 Dave Allan 2011-11-30 18:41:23 UTC
Alex, I've put this in POST, can you comment with the commit message?

Comment 4 Alex Jia 2011-12-01 02:30:56 UTC
Dave, thanks.

commit d082e1b966231743a142cc355d5da4edbec4dc9a
Author: Alex Jia <ajia>
Date:   Wed Nov 30 16:25:07 2011 +0800

    virsh: correct return value error
    
    Fix cmdDomblklist to return 'true' on success instead of '0'
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758590

Comment 6 Min Zhan 2012-01-10 07:32:12 UTC
Reproduce this bug with libvirt-0.9.4-23.el6.x86_64.

Verified this bug with libvirt-0.9.9-1.el6 with below steps:

Steps:
# virsh domblklist rhel62
Target     Source
------------------------------------------------
hda        /var/lib/libvirt/images/rhel62.img

# echo $?
0

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 06:37:22 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0748.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.