Hide Forgot
Created attachment 37 [details] Slightly more elaborate strict_low_part patch
(In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=37) [details] > proposed patch Hi Sebastian, Can you mail the patch to 'glusterfs-patches.com' so it can be traced through 'patches.gluster.com'. Regards,
Hi, I have just sent the patch to the address you mentioned. Previously I followed the instruction published on 'http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Development_Work_Flow' page and sent the patch to 'gluster-devel'. Best Regards, Sebastian
> > Previously I followed the instruction published on > 'http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Development_Work_Flow' page and sent the > patch to 'gluster-devel'. > Oops, If you have sent patch to 'gluster-devel' ML then its fine too, it will be received by the patchwork properly.
I've noticed that SuperFashHash function which is used in libglusterfs (in dict.c) is modified in such a way that it always returns the value of the second parameter of its invocation - len. This of course results in a lot of conflicts in resulting hash :)
PATCH: http://patches.gluster.com/patch/812 in master (libglusterfs: fix SuperFastHash function used in dicitionaries in fact it always returned the value of second parameter (len) as a result.)