Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionJonathan Underwood
2011-12-09 19:15:54 UTC
Description of problem:
rpc.gssd segfaults upon first user login with nfs-utils-1.2.3-15. Reverting to nfs-utils-1.2.3-7 fixes the problem.
Seriously, why is nfs-utils turning into such a crap shoot lately? Do you have any kerberized nfs4 test systems??
RHEL 6.1 released with broken nfs-utils for kerberized nfsv4 and hasn't been fixed in the meantime, and now you're pushing broken shit back to 6.0. Yes, this is a rant. Yes, your engineering and QA sucks.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa | grep nfs-utils
nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.x86_64
nfs-utils-lib-1.1.5-1.el6.x86_64
How reproducible:
Every time.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install this update.
2. Try and log in with users home directories mounted over nfs4 with Kerberos.
3. rpc.gssd segfaults.
Actual results:
rpc.gssd[10864]: segfault at ffffffffffff0eb0 ip 00007fa6f10761fc sp 00007fffeae30cf0 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7fa6f1001000+197000]
abrt-hook-ccpp[10973]: segfault at 8 ip 000000306787f9c1 sp 00007fffef5d0988 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[3067800000+197000]
Expected results:
Additional info:
Comment 2Jonathan Underwood
2011-12-09 19:35:54 UTC
That should be: "Reverting to nfs-utils-1.2.2-7 fixes the problem. "
Comment 3Jonathan Underwood
2011-12-12 11:29:05 UTC
A backtrace:
(gdb) run -f -vvv
Starting program: /usr/sbin/rpc.gssd -f -vvv
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
beginning poll
Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37.
0x00007ffff674e018 in __poll (fds=0x7ffff8206650, nfds=256,
timeout=<value optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:83
83 return INLINE_SYSCALL (poll, 3, CHECK_N (fds, nfds), nfds, timeout);
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install keyutils-libs-1.4-1.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-2.el6.x86_64
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff674e018 in __poll (fds=0x7ffff8206650, nfds=256,
timeout=<value optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:83
#1 0x00007ffff7ff31c8 in gssd_run () at gssd_main_loop.c:224
#2 0x00007ffff7ff2ede in main (argc=<value optimized out>,
argv=<value optimized out>) at gssd.c:187
Comment 4Tomasz Kepczynski
2011-12-12 17:20:52 UTC
Well, what can I say... I couldn't agree more with the rant above.
(In reply to comment #4)
> Well, what can I say... I couldn't agree more with the rant above.
My apologies for you pain... Obviously if we saw something like
this in our QE testing it would have been fixed...
Question, Are you using a Windows AD as you KDC?
Comment 7Jonathan Underwood
2011-12-14 15:41:12 UTC
Nope, the KDC is another RH6 box.
I should add I am seeing this on sc ientific linux boxes, but will go and see if I can reproduce it on RHEL boxes.
BZ #765909 also seems relevant, perhaps. However, I have not disabled ipv6 anywhere.
Comment 8Jonathan Underwood
2011-12-15 19:21:19 UTC
OK, I can't reproduce this at all on a RHEL6 box, so it seems to be an issue with the rebuilt SL package.
Many apologies for the noise (and misplaced rant).