Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 766653

Summary: System template incorrectly shown under "Full Products" list during promotion
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: James Laska <jlaska>
Component: Content ManagementAssignee: Katello Bug Bin <katello-bugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.0CC: jturner, kbidarka, mmccune
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-31 09:56:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot.png none

Description James Laska 2011-12-12 14:33:47 UTC
Created attachment 545748 [details]
Screenshot.png

Description of problem:

When attempting to promote 4 products and a system template, the system template is listed under the "Full Products" section of the promotion user-interface (see attached screenshot).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 * candlepin-0.5.4-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-0.1.135-2.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-certs-tools-1.0.1-2.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-cli-0.1.23-3.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-configure-0.1.31-2.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-httpd-ssl-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-trusted-ssl-cert-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * pulp-0.0.254-4.el6.src.rpm

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Import manifest w/ official RHT subscriptions+repos
2. Enable RHEL6.1 RPMS
3. Create a custom provider with 3 products: SystemEngine, CloudEngine and Common (each with one or more repositories)
4. Create a system template that includes all of the above
5. Create a new non-Locker environment
6. Attempt to promote the 3 custom provider products, the RHEL61 distro *and* the system template

Actual results:

See screenshot attached.  THe system template (created in step#4) is listed under "Full Products" in the promotion user-interface

Expected results:

In the promotion user-interface, "Full Products" should only list products.  Also, "System Templates" should only list system templates.

Additional info:

 * ehelms inspected this issue and noted the following ...

09:27:30   ehelms: jlaska: if you could mention that it appears due to alphabetical sorting in additional notes as a reminder of the cause that would be great

Comment 1 James Laska 2012-01-17 21:26:38 UTC
Still is present in katello-0.1.174-2.el6.noarch.  Adding mmccune for some help directing traffic.

Comment 2 Kedar Bidarkar 2012-01-31 09:56:20 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 772169 ***