Bug 76681 - Location of iface-specific dhclient files
Summary: Location of iface-specific dhclient files
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: initscripts
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-10-24 21:28 UTC by Dan Morrill
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-29 20:21:00 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Morrill 2002-10-24 21:28:51 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Description of problem:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup is responsible for invoking dhclient
where/when appropriate.  When run, ifup invokes dhclient to use a config file
specific to that device; this is fine, though it may be a matter of taste.

However, the config files are /etc/dhclient-${IFACE}.conf -- e.g.
/etc/dhclient-eth0.conf.  This is Ugly(TM) (IMO.)

These config files should go in either /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, or at
least in a new /etc/dhclient.d/ or something.  (I personally favor
/etc/dhclient.d/, but whatever.)

Note that this is a style/consistency thing, not a true bug (since ifup does
work as-is.)  This may be related to bug 74862.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot up w/ DHCP enabled.
	

Actual Results:  dhclient looks for iface-specific config data in
/etc/dhclient-${IFACE}.conf

Expected Results:  dhclient should look for iface-specific config data in
something like /etc/dhclient.d/dhclient-${IFACE}.conf

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2005-09-29 20:21:00 UTC
Closing bugs on older, no longer supported, releases. Apologies for any lack of
response.

At this point, I doubt that this will change, it doesn't seem to be worth the
effort.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.