Bug 76732 - libelf-devel should be prerequisite for rpm-4.2.0-4.src.rpm
Summary: libelf-devel should be prerequisite for rpm-4.2.0-4.src.rpm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Johnson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-10-25 16:27 UTC by Ken MacFarlane
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-10-25 16:27:27 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ken MacFarlane 2002-10-25 16:27:21 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020911

Description of problem:
The source rebuild of rpm fails if libelf-devel is not present.  Specifically,
build fails trying to find files libelf/libelf.h and libelf/gelf.h.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -e libelf-devel
2. rpmbuild --rebuild rpm-4.2-0.4.src.rpm

	

Actual Results:  creating rpmcache
source='striptofile.c' object='striptofile.o' libtool=no \
depfile='.deps/striptofile.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/striptofile.TPo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I.. -I../build -I../lib -I../rpmdb -I../rp
mio -I../popt -I../elfutils/libelf -I../elfutils/libdwarf -I../zlib -I../zlib -I
../misc    -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -Wall -c `test
-f 'striptofile.c' || echo './'`striptofile.c
striptofile.c:4:27: libelf/libelf.h: No such file or directory
striptofile.c:5:25: libelf/gelf.h: No such file or directory
In file included from striptofile.c:8:
sections.h:4:25: libelf/gelf.h: No such file or directory


Expected Results:  rpmbuild completes successfully.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2002-10-25 16:39:05 UTC
libelf-devel is not a build prereq because
rpm has an internal copy of elfutils in rpm-4.2
that will be used. No, libelf-devel is not adequate.

The rationale for this apparent bloat is that
the gelf API used by rpm (to preserve MD5 checks for
prelinked DSO's, and to generate dependencies) is not
(yet) widely available, prereq's will be added if/when
that time comes.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.