First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 76801 - 1.1.2 RPM requires oaf >= 0.6.10
1.1.2 RPM requires oaf >= 0.6.10
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: evolution (Show other bugs)
1.0
All Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2002-10-26 19:03 EDT by David Hollis
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:47 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-02-04 18:38:36 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description David Hollis 2002-10-26 19:03:08 EDT 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021020

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have oaf-0.6.9 from RH8 installed
2. Try to rebuild evolution-1.1.2 from RawHide
3. configure dies because 0.6.10 oaf is required
	

Actual Results:  Configure dies

Expected Results:  evolution builds successfully

Additional info:
Comment 1 Petri T. Koistinen 2002-10-26 19:09:28 EDT 
Well, check your mirror again. I have oaf-0.6.10-3 installed. You shouldn't
complain something like this in Raw Hide. It is your own fault that you are
using it. ;-)

There you go:
http://www.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/rawhide/i386/RedHat/RPMS/oaf-0.6.10-3.i386.rpm
http://www.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/rawhide/i386/RedHat/RPMS/oaf-devel-0.6.10-3.i386.rpm
Comment 2 David Hollis 2002-10-26 19:12:13 EDT 
Just pointing out that it should be a BuildRequires.  That's all.
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2002-10-31 17:53:52 EST 
Fixed in CVS, will be reflected in next package build
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.