Bug 770445 - "undefined method `name' for nil:NilClass " : When created a catalog entry with wrong hwp
Summary: "undefined method `name' for nil:NilClass " : When created a catalog entry wi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 1.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Petr Blaho
QA Contact: wes hayutin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-26 16:17 UTC by Shveta
Modified: 2012-05-15 21:30 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-05-15 21:30:51 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
err (179.27 KB, image/png)
2011-12-26 16:17 UTC, Shveta 		no flags Details
hwp_does_not_exist (233.19 KB, image/png)
2012-02-01 09:52 UTC, Shveta 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2012:0583 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE new packages: aeolus-conductor 2012-05-15 22:31:59 UTC

Description Shveta 2011-12-26 16:17:09 UTC 
Created attachment 549607 [details]
err

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. [root@hp-bl260cg5-01 ~]# aeolus-image import --provider_account ssachdev --id ami-31d41658

Image: 349e9e79-db0e-4ae2-bd6b-7cdeeeee883b
Build: 8ae6a9a9-804f-4eee-83dd-7b7046ca3af0
Target Image: 222e2ee6-cc0c-4a17-a780-d3c03eb04fbb
Provider Image: 200998b0-9c91-4a5d-94c4-555570d3442e
Status: COMPLETE

2. create a deployable def, in this definition use a hwp that does not exist in
the system
3. Go to Monitor Page and click on the catalog link 
"undefined method `name' for nil:NilClass "
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

rpm -qa|grep aeolus
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-0.20111222233342gitd98cb57.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.0-0.20111222173430git17b704a.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-0.20111222173411gitc13b654.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-0.20111222173356git3cd6277.el6.noarch
aeolus-all-0.8.0-0.20111222233342gitd98cb57.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-0.20111222233342gitd98cb57.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-0.20111222233342gitd98cb57.el6.noarch
Comment 1 wes hayutin 2012-01-10 17:10:44 UTC 
adding to ce-sprint-next
Comment 2 wes hayutin 2012-01-10 17:13:33 UTC 
adding to ce-sprint-next
Comment 3 wes hayutin 2012-01-12 16:32:32 UTC 
adding to ce-sprint
Comment 4 wes hayutin 2012-01-12 16:39:23 UTC 
removing ce-sprint-next tracker
Comment 5 Petr Blaho 2012-01-23 16:24:46 UTC 
I have discovered another bug in displaying assemblies for deployment during writing test for this bug.

When there are two assemblies defined in deployable xml document with the same image id the launch from catalog page will show the first assembly twice.

There some bad code in the view - consulted with jprovazn.

I will work on this too. I will post solution soon.
Comment 6 Petr Blaho 2012-01-25 12:54:34 UTC 
commit 8bcb08553ce4d0a6f40f8a5ce81eda1954bc8ac8
Author: Petr Blaho <pblaho>
Date:   Tue Jan 24 15:32:06 2012 +0100

    Correct displaying of assemblies
    
    on launch from catalog page
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770445
Comment 7 Steve Linabery 2012-01-31 22:18:36 UTC 
8bcb08553ce4d0a6f40f8a5ce81eda1954bc8ac8 in aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-17
Comment 8 Shveta 2012-02-01 09:52:06 UTC 
Created attachment 558782 [details]
hwp_does_not_exist
Comment 9 Shveta 2012-02-01 09:53:01 UTC 
Verified in

rpm -qa|grep aeolus
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-17.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.0-11.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-17.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-7.el6.noarch
aeolus-all-0.8.0-17.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-17.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-7.el6.noarch
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2012-05-15 21:30:51 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.