Bug 771432 - Provide native systemd service
Summary: Provide native systemd service
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cpqarrayd
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Juran
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 751869
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-03 18:18 UTC by Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
Modified: 2012-08-08 18:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-08 18:04:18 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Native systemd unit for cpqarrayd (119 bytes, text/plain)
2012-01-03 18:21 UTC, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
no flags Details

Description Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2012-01-03 18:18:07 UTC
Description of problem:

Let's get the ball rolling on this one...

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2012-01-03 18:21:13 UTC
Created attachment 550495 [details]
Native systemd unit for cpqarrayd

I dont have any compaq hw hence this is untested ( Might need Type=forking and if relevant PIDFile=/run/cpqarrayd.pid in the [Service] section of the unit file ) but can be used as an start

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-05-15 13:12:42 UTC
David, any objection to my making this change?

Comment 3 David Juran 2012-07-31 09:20:54 UTC
None whatsoever, I don't even have a valid excuse for ignoring my Fedora packages for this long )-:

On a side-note, I not longer have access to any cciss hardware, so if you do (and you feel the functionality of cpqarrayd isn't covered by cciss_vol_status) I'm more then happy to let you take over this package...

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-07-31 14:16:43 UTC
I don't either, actually.  It seems like this might be retirable.  Do you, or anyone you know, have a position on that?  If not, I'll go ahead and do this.

Comment 5 David Juran 2012-08-08 18:04:18 UTC
Package retired, as discussed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.