Bug 772582 - Review Request: python-rest-client - A REST Client for use in python, using httplib2 and urllib2
Summary: Review Request: python-rest-client - A REST Client for use in python, using h...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Simone Caronni
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-09 10:24 UTC by Matthias Runge
Modified: 2012-02-04 21:01 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-rest-client-0.3-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-23 21:52:42 UTC
Type: ---
negativo17: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Matthias Runge 2012-01-09 10:24:59 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-rest-client.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: 
A REST Client for use in python, using httplib2 and urllib2.

Includes a version that is suitable for use in the Google App Engine 
environment.

Scratch-Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3632897

[mrunge@mrungexp SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm ./python-rest-client.spec 
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 1 Simone Caronni 2012-01-11 08:27:12 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



==== Generic ====
[ ]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[ ]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[ ]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[ ]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[ ]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[ ]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[ ]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[ ]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[ ]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: MUST Package installs properly.
[ ]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


rpmlint python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/slaanesh/772582/python-rest-client-0.3.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package     : ef58ada2245fc30086bd8b389232f8ce
  MD5SUM upstream package : ef58ada2245fc30086bd8b389232f8ce

[ ]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[ ]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[ ]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[ ]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[ ]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[ ]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[ ]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5

Comment 2 Simone Caronni 2012-01-11 08:30:27 UTC
Everything seems ok, the only "bang" is in case of an EPEL 5 build.
Builds fine on my box.

Comment 3 Simone Caronni 2012-01-11 09:31:22 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.noarch.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


rpmlint python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16.src.rpm

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/slaanesh/772582/python-rest-client-0.3.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package     : ef58ada2245fc30086bd8b389232f8ce
  MD5SUM upstream package : ef58ada2245fc30086bd8b389232f8ce

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[-]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5


I reviewed all the other items and it seems good to go.

Comment 4 Matthias Runge 2012-01-11 09:37:49 UTC
ok, thank you for your formal review.

I'll drop the rm -rf from %install to resolve the issue. I'm not going to provide an EPEL5 build.

Comment 5 Matthias Runge 2012-01-11 10:33:04 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-rest-client
Short Description: A REST Client for use in python, using httplib2 and urllib2
Owners: mrunge
Branches: f16 el6

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-01-11 13:23:28 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-01-13 09:04:42 UTC
python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-01-13 09:18:35 UTC
python-rest-client-0.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rest-client-0.3-1.el6

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-01-15 20:02:18 UTC
python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-01-23 21:52:42 UTC
python-rest-client-0.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2012-02-04 21:01:49 UTC
python-rest-client-0.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.