Bug 77314 - URL field in urw-fonts package description is invalid
Summary: URL field in urw-fonts package description is invalid
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: urw-fonts (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: noarch Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ngo Than
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks: 237018
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-11-05 00:42 UTC by petrosyan
Modified: 2009-10-27 11:55 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-27 11:55:48 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description petrosyan 2002-11-05 00:42:26 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
URL field ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/ in urw-fonts package description
is invalid

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.0-26

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpm -qi urw-fonts
2.make sure URL         : ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
is invalid

Comment 1 Ngo Than 2002-11-06 00:09:17 UTC
Hmm, it's correct here. Could you give more details to this problem, please?

Comment 2 petrosyan 2008-05-21 23:05:05 UTC
When I try to open URL ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
I get an error message "550 Sorry, I don't see that directory."

Comment 3 petrosyan 2008-07-17 01:46:03 UTC
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-5.fc9.noarch

Comment 4 petrosyan 2008-11-25 22:27:38 UTC
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-6.fc10.noarch

Comment 5 petrosyan 2009-06-10 08:20:17 UTC
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11.noarch

Comment 6 petrosyan 2009-10-21 22:23:59 UTC
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-8.fc12.noarch

Comment 7 Ngo Than 2009-10-27 11:55:48 UTC
it's fixed in 2.4-9


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.