Bug 77314 - URL field in urw-fonts package description is invalid
URL field in urw-fonts package description is invalid
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: urw-fonts (Show other bugs)
rawhide
noarch Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ngo Than
David Lawrence
ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks: 237018
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-11-04 19:42 EST by petrosyan
Modified: 2009-10-27 07:55 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-10-27 07:55:48 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description petrosyan 2002-11-04 19:42:26 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
URL field ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/ in urw-fonts package description
is invalid

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.0-26

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpm -qi urw-fonts
2.make sure URL         : ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
is invalid
Comment 1 Ngo Than 2002-11-05 19:09:17 EST
Hmm, it's correct here. Could you give more details to this problem, please?
Comment 2 petrosyan 2008-05-21 19:05:05 EDT
When I try to open URL ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
I get an error message "550 Sorry, I don't see that directory."
Comment 3 petrosyan 2008-07-16 21:46:03 EDT
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-5.fc9.noarch
Comment 4 petrosyan 2008-11-25 17:27:38 EST
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-6.fc10.noarch
Comment 5 petrosyan 2009-06-10 04:20:17 EDT
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11.noarch
Comment 6 petrosyan 2009-10-21 18:23:59 EDT
this bug is still present in urw-fonts-2.4-8.fc12.noarch
Comment 7 Ngo Than 2009-10-27 07:55:48 EDT
it's fixed in 2.4-9

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.