Hide Forgot
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2238 It doesn't make a lot of sense for ipausers to be a posix group and we will save a few cycles in compat and sssd by making it non-posix. This is for new installs only.
Fixed upstream: master: af233fbda188e00ec2504765788a90da633c4f59 ipa-2-2: 2334ef2d57704f71779f82302933321bf05dd9ef
verified : # ipa group-show --all --raw ipausers dn: cn=ipausers,cn=groups,cn=accounts,dc=testrelm,dc=com cn: ipausers description: Default group for all users ipauniqueid: 183217b8-71eb-11e1-a45a-5254009e206c objectclass: top objectclass: groupofnames objectclass: nestedgroup objectclass: ipausergroup objectclass: ipaobject :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: [ LOG ] :: ipa-group-cli-91: bz773488 - Make ipausers a non-posix group on new installs :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: [ LOG ] :: Group type is ipa :: [ LOG ] :: objectclass top was returned as expected with group-show --all :: [ LOG ] :: objectclass groupofnames was returned as expected with group-show --all :: [ LOG ] :: objectclass nestedgroup was returned as expected with group-show --all :: [ LOG ] :: objectclass ipausergroup was returned as expected with group-show --all :: [ LOG ] :: objectclass ipaobject was returned as expected with group-show --all :: [ PASS ] :: Verify ipauser group objectclasses. :: [ LOG ] :: Duration: 3s :: [ LOG ] :: Assertions: 1 good, 0 bad :: [ PASS ] :: RESULT: ipa-group-cli-91: bz773488 - Make ipausers a non-posix group on new installs version: ipa-server-2.2.0-4.el6.x86_64
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: No documentation needed.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0819.html