Bug 773664 - System templates - left pane package view does not autoscroll
Summary: System templates - left pane package view does not autoscroll
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI
Version: 6.0.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Eric Helms
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: katello-blockers
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-12 14:22 UTC by Corey Welton
Modified: 2019-09-26 13:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-22 18:18:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Corey Welton 2012-01-12 14:22:44 UTC 
Description of problem:

When viewing a list of available packages for a system template, user can only see enough packages to fill the main view. Scrolling down does not trigger an autoscroll to the next available selection, and there doesn't appear to be a way to manually scroll.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Sync RH content
2.  Content Management > System Templates
3.  RHEL x86_64 > Packages; wait for list to populate
4. Scroll down to bottom of populated package view (you should get to about as far as "NetworkManager-devel". Try to get anything else to show up.
  
Actual results:
No autoscroll, no anything else, no way to view other packages.

Expected results:
Autoscroll or manual scroll.

Additional info:
Pretty sure this is a regression....?
Comment 1 Mike McCune 2012-01-17 23:31:55 UTC 
this used to work ... regression
Comment 2 Eric Helms 2012-01-23 15:53:47 UTC 
2e285c6c17cc6e9ad9af577df1e4850a06d9c34b

This happened as a result of the switch to elasticsearch and is should be fixed with the above commit.
Comment 3 Mike McCune 2012-01-26 19:08:09 UTC 
mass ON_QA move
Comment 5 Corey Welton 2012-02-01 04:26:22 UTC 
QA Verified.
Comment 7 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 17:59:10 UTC 
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.