Bug 77699 - Adapters found to be in VGA mode on server entry are not supported by the MMIO-only version of this driver.
Adapters found to be in VGA mode on server entry are not supported by the MMI...
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: XFree86 (Show other bugs)
ia64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Mike A. Harris
David Lawrence
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2002-11-12 07:40 EST by Johan Walles
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-03-15 02:19:13 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Log from X refusing to start (5.13 KB, text/plain)
2002-11-12 07:42 EST, Johan Walles
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Johan Walles 2002-11-12 07:40:33 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827

Description of problem:
"startx" fails to start X.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Log in as root
2. type "startx"

Actual Results:  (EE) ATI(0): Adapters found to be in VGA mode on server entry
are not supported by the MMIO-only version of this driver.

Expected Results:  X should have been started.

Additional info:

Will provide full output from X as an attachment.
Comment 1 Johan Walles 2002-11-12 07:42:39 EST
Created attachment 84604 [details]
Log from X refusing to start
Comment 3 Johan Walles 2002-11-13 02:59:29 EST
What the X server is telling me *clearly* is that the driver does in fact
support the current adapter but that it is in some sort of state ("VGA mode")
that the driver can not handle.  The conclusion is of course that I have to
somehow put the adapter into a supported state (what?) before starting X. 
Especially since the installer managed to do graphics, and claims to have
successfully configured X, this is the quite obvious meaning of the message.

If this is not the intent of this (undocumented AFAICT, or can you point me to
where I can read about it?) message, it should either be rephrased to say what
it means, documented, or preferrably both.

Other than that, I appreciate your effort to add support for the adapter.
Comment 5 Johan Walles 2002-11-13 06:26:42 EST
I still fail to see how it can be possible for the installer to run in graphics
mode if the graphics card is unsupported.
Comment 7 Mike A. Harris 2003-03-15 02:19:13 EST
Closing as NOTABUG since the reason this happens is intention due to
some ia64 whackiness, and is from patches applied specifically by the
request of Hewlett Packard, and supplied by them.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.