Bug 778485 (SOA-953) - jboss.esb:service=MessageCounter service missing
Summary: jboss.esb:service=MessageCounter service missing
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: SOA-953
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4
Classification: JBoss
Component: JBossESB
Version: 4.3 CR1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.3 GA
Assignee: Julian Coleman
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-10-17 09:20 UTC by Aleksandar Kostadinov
Modified: 2008-10-28 14:31 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-28 14:31:11 UTC
Type: Task

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-953 0 Major Closed jboss.esb:service=MessageCounter service missing 2014-08-16 18:19:58 UTC

Description Aleksandar Kostadinov 2008-10-17 09:20:39 UTC 
Date of First Response: 2008-10-17 06:43:52
project_key: SOA

jboss.esb:service=MessageCounter service is missing from the CR1 build compared with the IR releases. Please, verify that is desirable or fix.

Based on the previous verification task, I'm assigning directly to you, Julian :)
Comment 1 Julian Coleman 2008-10-17 10:43:52 UTC 
service=MessageCounter is visible in the JMX console on both embedded and
standalone.
Comment 2 Aleksandar Kostadinov 2008-10-17 11:15:12 UTC 
look at http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/SOA-Release/job/soa-unix-scripts/57/
services-list.log for the 3 server - production, all and standalone

I see it though in the MBeans list. The test is considering a service any MBean that wither is:
1. subclass of ServiceMBean
or
2. subclass of StateManageable with attribute stateManageable being true

So I'd guess it has changed type?
Comment 3 Kevin Conner 2008-10-17 11:19:41 UTC 
It is just a normal MBean now, no longer a subclass of ServiceMBean.
Comment 4 Julian Coleman 2008-10-17 11:24:32 UTC 
Verified against src change.
Comment 5 Len DiMaggio 2008-10-17 14:01:05 UTC 
Will we see any functional impact of this change? For example, in the JON console?
Comment 6 Kevin Conner 2008-10-17 14:05:09 UTC 
None whatsoever as there was no reason for it to be a subclass of ServiceMBean in the first place.  It doesn't have a lifecycle associated with it.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.