Bug 779864 (SOA-2223) - Aggregator meta data in properties
Summary: Aggregator meta data in properties
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 779855
Alias: SOA-2223
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: JBossESB
Version: 5.0.0 GA
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Kevin Conner
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-10 16:24 UTC by Stelios Koussouris
Modified: 2011-02-08 23:02 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-08 23:02:18 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 779855 0 high CLOSED Aggregator meta data in properties 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-2223 0 None None None Never

Internal Links: 779855

Description Stelios Koussouris 2010-08-10 16:24:10 UTC
Affects: Interactive Demo/Tutorial, Documentation (Ref Guide, User Guide, etc.)
Help Desk Ticket Reference: https://enterprise.redhat.com/issue-tracker/?module=issues&action=view&tid=864653&gid=1354
project_key: SOA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MessageMulticaster creates an aggregation id and stores this value in message properties. Normally this does not prove to be an issue but when using invm transport it may cause issues.

When the message is sent to multiple services, using pass by reference semantics, then all services will see the *same* properties and may, depending on timing, see the same aggregation id.

The aggregation value should really be in the message context as this section is always duplicated when creating a reference, never shared. The problem we face is that users may already be referencing the property, especially if they are creating a fresh response message, so we need to think about handling this.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Kevin Conner 2010-08-10 16:24:50 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is related to SOA-2215


Comment 2 Kevin Conner 2010-08-10 16:25:54 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBESB-3310


Comment 3 Kevin Conner 2010-08-10 16:36:10 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is incorporated by SOA-2210


Comment 4 Kevin Conner 2010-08-17 16:48:29 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBESB-3464


Comment 5 Laura Bailey 2010-12-17 00:41:33 UTC
Writer: Added: Darrin


Comment 6 Laura Bailey 2010-12-17 00:47:57 UTC
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Not Yet Documented


Comment 8 Kevin Conner 2011-02-08 23:01:49 UTC
This is now a duplicate of SOA-2215

Comment 9 Kevin Conner 2011-02-08 23:01:49 UTC
Link: Added: This issue duplicates SOA-2215



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.