Bug 78027 – documentation errors in 'cat' examples

Bug 78027 - documentation errors in 'cat' examples

Summary:	documentation errors in 'cat' examples

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	rhl-gsg (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	8.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity low
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	John Ha
QA Contact:	John Ha
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-11-17 17:47 EST by Nick Mumbach
Modified:	2014-08-04 18:14 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-11-17 17:49:18 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
specifics of documentation errors (1.64 KB, text/plain) 2002-11-17 17:49 EST, Nick Mumbach	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Nick Mumbach 2002-11-17 17:47:34 EST

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.follow the rhl-gsg 'cat' examples
2.
3.
	

Additional info:

Comment 1 Nick Mumbach 2002-11-17 17:49:12 EST

Created attachment 85367 [details]
specifics of documentation errors

Comment 2 John Ha 2002-11-18 11:04:52 EST

Thank you for noticing this. The error was found and corrected after the Getting
Started Guide had already gone to the printers, so the online version of the
documentation located at http://www.redhat.com/docs already shows the correct
output. The corrected screenshot will appear in the next printed version of the
Getting Started Guide.

Sorry if the error cause any undue confusion; and thanks again for finding it.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.