Bug 781191 (SOA-3693) - SOA-P 5 ESB Deployment options prompts are asking for wrong information
Summary: SOA-P 5 ESB Deployment options prompts are asking for wrong information
Keywords:
Status: VERIFIED
Alias: SOA-3693
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: JBossESB, Monitoring and Management, JON
Version: 5.2.0 GA
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ER3
: 5.3.0 GA
Assignee: Kevin Conner
QA Contact: Martin Vecera
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 767981
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-09 21:55 UTC by Larry O'Leary
Modified: 2018-03-29 21:47 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
When a user tried to deploy an ESB archive via either the Admin Console or JON, they were presented with legacy SOA 4.x options that were no longer relevant and some needed options were missing. To fix this issue, new options for farm and exploded archives have been added. As a result, users can now deploy these via the consoles and the right information will be asked of them by the software.
Clone Of:
Environment:
JBoss SOA-P 5.2 admin-console
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBESB-3734 0 Major Closed SOA-P 5 ESB Deployment options prompts are asking for wrong information 2014-05-11 11:59:08 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-3693 0 Major Closed SOA-P 5 ESB Deployment options prompts are asking for wrong information 2014-05-11 11:59:08 UTC

Description Larry O'Leary 2012-01-09 21:55:52 UTC
Steps to Reproduce: #. Start SOA5
#. From Admin Console (admin-console) expand and select localhost -> JBossAS Servers - JBoss SOA-P 5 (default) -> JBoss ESB -> Deployments
#. Click 'Add a new resource' button


project_key: SOA

When deploying a new ESB using admin-console or JBoss Operations Network, the ESB plug-in is asking for deployment options which are only valid for SOA 4. For example, Deployment Location is asking for a path but in SOA 5 ProfileService is used to deploy managed components meaning that a destination directory can not be selected but instead the user should be selecting whether to deploy farmed or not.

Comment 1 RH Bugzilla Integration 2012-01-09 21:56:56 UTC
Bugzilla References: Added: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767981


Comment 2 RH Bugzilla Integration 2012-01-09 21:58:54 UTC
Larry O'Leary <loleary> made a comment on [bug 767981|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767981]

Logged against downstream JBossESB SOA-P bug tracker as https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SOA-3693

The JBoss ESB plug-in is managed/maintained by the JBossESB project.

Comment 3 Larry O'Leary 2012-01-10 17:56:39 UTC
Bugzilla References: Removed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767981 Added: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767981


Comment 4 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-01-12 23:42:47 UTC
RH Bugzilla Integration <no-reply> updated the status of jira SOA-3693 to Closed

Comment 5 Larry O'Leary 2012-05-11 22:00:03 UTC
What is the status of this? This was supposed to be in SOA 5.3 release. Has that happened. We need a tag for the updated ESB plug-in for inclusion in JBoss ON.

Comment 6 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-05-14 15:49:18 UTC
Tom Cunningham <tcunning> made a comment on jira JBESB-3734

Added options for farm and exploded.     Tested farm option against SOA-P 5.2, seems to work fine.   The plugin had already been using profile service, so no changes needed there.

tcunning@localhost:jonplugin]$ svn commit
Sending        jonplugin/as5/src/main/java/org/jbosson/plugins/jbossesb/ESB5Component.java
Sending        jonplugin/as5/src/main/resources/META-INF/rhq-plugin.xml
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 38087.

Comment 7 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-05-14 15:49:27 UTC
Tom Cunningham <tcunning> updated the status of jira JBESB-3734 to Resolved

Comment 8 JBoss JIRA Server 2012-05-14 15:49:32 UTC
Tom Cunningham <tcunning> updated the status of jira JBESB-3734 to Closed

Comment 9 Pavel Kralik 2012-06-11 11:53:36 UTC
Verified for JON and admin console. JON 3.1.0.GA and SOA-P 5.3.0.ER3. The deployment has options: File path, Deploy Exploded (Yes/No) and Deploy Farmed (Yes/No).

Comment 10 David Le Sage 2012-06-13 00:20:11 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
When a user tried to deploy an ESB archive via either the Admin Console or JON, they were presented with legacy SOA 4.x options that were no longer relevant and some needed options were missing. To fix this issue, new options for farm and exploded archives have been added. As a result, users can now deploy these via the consoles and the right information will be asked of them by the software.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.