Bug 7818
| Summary: | Network installation of RH6.1/Sparc fails for SPARCstation SLC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | gtsili |
| Component: | installer | Assignee: | Matt Wilson <msw> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | phil, redhat |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | sparc | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2001-09-14 16:22:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
gtsili
1999-12-15 20:47:40 UTC
How much RAM does the machine have?? It sounds like the machine is running out of RAM when trying to load the tftp image. It is funny that you closed the report before my reply. The Sparc has 16 MBytes of memmory and from what I have read so far, that ammount of memmory is enough. Also I am not the only one with the same problem ... check bug #8006. *** Bug 8006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I am also having this problem with a Sparc SLC diskless with 16MB RAM. The momentary delay between completing the tftp load (less than 1.5MB) and the wibbly screen suggests that the transfer has worked but the code is broken. Also I found that the error message had three 'W's at the start. No one has ever posted any error messages for this problem. What are they? There was an error message reported at the end of the second paragraph of the original report, namely : Window Underflow (or in my case WWWindow Underflow) What version of the prom? Prom version is 1.4 The exact text of the last line before the system hangs is : 130600 DDWWWindow UnderflowType b (boot), c (continue), or n (new command mode) Why has this been closed? What action was taken to resolve this issue? we were not able to reproduce the problem on the slc or elc here under 6.2. We're unable to take any further action to track down this bug. But this bug was logged under RH6.1, not 6.2. Would be good for you guys to know what was wrong with that version of the SPARC release in case it happens again in the future. Oh well, it doesn't matter now anyway I suppose........ SPARC is not a currently supported architecture. |