Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/diet/python-omniORB.spec SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/diet/python-omniORB-3.6-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: omniORB is a CORBA 2.6 compliant open source implementation for python (requires omniORB to be reviewed first)
Is this package planned to be sent to EPEL ? If not, can you : - remove BuildRoot - remove %defattr, %clean and the rm in %install For python, you need to say what version of python you need ( ie python2 or 3 ) for the buildRequires. You can also drop the snippet for python_sitelib, as they are now already set. The patch should have a mention of being sent upstream ( url, mail ).
Yes I plan to push this into EPEL5+ (since omniORB is already there). I fixed the BR (didn't know that EL5 python already provided python2), python_sitelib is only defined for EL5. A mail has been sent to the maintainer for both omniORB and python-omniORB about the FSF address issue, a comment was added. new spec and src.rpm: Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/diet/python-omniORB.spec SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/diet/python-omniORB-3.6-1.fc16.src.rpm
You should add the url to download the tarball : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net And rpmlint complain : python-omniORB-examples.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-omniORB-examples-3.6/examples/poa/mainthread.py /usr/bin/env python-omniORB-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources python-omniORB.i686: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/_omnicodesetsmodule.so.3.6 _omnicodesetsmodule.so.3
1. download url fixed 2. for the examples, i'm unsure of where i should put them (especially since they're noarch). I'm open to any suggestions. 3. the provides is now filtered and should not appear anymore spec and src.rpm updated. (still the same url)
For the example, wouldn't removing the permission to execute be sufficient ? The debuginfo issue is maybe listed on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo , and is a MUST, so should be fixed.
Seems the omniORBpy-devel package is missing. files: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/omniidl_be/python.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/omniidl_be/python.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/omniidl_be/python.pyo # -*- python -*- # Package : omniidl # python.py Created on: 1999/10/29 # Author : Duncan Grisby (dpg1) ..... # Description: # # Back-end for Python
Is there any progress in having python-omniorb in Fedora together with the rest of omniorb packages? Any help needed?
I'm not sure how successful I'll be just yet, but I'm attempting to package salome which requires this package. Let me know if you need any help.
Haïkel, if you are not actively working on this anymore, I'm happy to continue the effort. I have an updated SPEC and SRPM here: Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-omniORB.spec SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/omniORBpy-3.7-1.fc21.src.rpm
Thank you Sandro, feel free to take over (may i offer you we exchange acls, since i already maintain omniORB ?). I'm on the verge of burnout and won't cling to a package that is very low in my priority list.
No problem with comaintaining omniORB (is this is what you meant by "exchanging acls"?). As for this package, I'll start a new review-request and close this as duplicate. Take care.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1065758 ***