Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 783073 - Review Request: vishnu - DIET add-on packages
Review Request: vishnu - DIET add-on packages
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 783071
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2012-01-19 04:09 EST by Haïkel Guémar
Modified: 2014-06-09 07:49 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2014-06-09 07:49:16 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Haïkel Guémar 2012-01-19 04:09:06 EST
Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/diet/vishnu.spec
SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/diet/vishnu-1.2.6-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: vishnu is a diet add-on that brings:
* User Management System
* Tasks Management System (abstraction layers over batch schedulers)
* File Management System
* Information Management System
Comment 1 Michael Scherer 2012-03-24 15:23:42 EDT
So now that diet is in, this one should be the next.

- the license is not present in all cases. For exemple, if I install vishnu-ums-server, it just pull vshnu-core-server, and there is no license

- the copying file is IMHO not sufficient, maybe you should bundle the rest in License/*

- rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is not needed in %install 

- I think you should use the %version in %setup and in $SOURCE0 

- there is no url for Source0, nor any indication on where to get the source code 

- the servers do not need to be started by systemd ?

- like diet, I assume the tests are not practical to run on koji/mock ?

- I am sure that better description could help to understand what each packages do ( even if this is rather specialized )

- there is support for documentation created by doxygen, wouldn't that be useful to enable it ?
Comment 2 Mario Blättermann 2012-09-22 16:20:30 EDT
Any progress in this review...?
Comment 3 Haïkel Guémar 2012-09-24 01:57:50 EDT
i need to update the package to latest version.
Comment 4 Haïkel Guémar 2014-06-09 07:49:16 EDT
Let's drop it, upstream is not interested anymore interacting with the FOSS community.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.