Bug 786226 – List of product repositories not sorted alphabetically

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 786226 - List of product repositories not sorted alphabetically

Summary:	List of product repositories not sorted alphabetically

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Satellite 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	WebUI (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.0.0
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity low (vote)
Target Milestone:	Unspecified
Target Release:	Unused
Assigned To:	Pavel Pokorny
QA Contact:	Og Maciel
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Triaged

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-01-31 13:46 EST by James Laska
Modified:	2013-09-02 03:00 EDT (History)
CC List:	6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	The sort order logic for a product's available repositories was unclear. This fix corrects the sort order logic and available repositories are now sorted alphabetically.
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-12-04 14:41:49 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Screenshot (59.97 KB, image/png) 2012-01-31 13:46 EST, James Laska	no flags	Details
Screenshot (30.64 KB, image/png) 2012-09-17 19:58 EDT, Og Maciel	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHSA-2012:1543	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Important: CloudForms System Engine 1.1 update	2012-12-04 19:39:57 EST

Groups: None (edit)

Description James Laska 2012-01-31 13:46:49 EST

Created attachment 558664 [details]
Screenshot

Description of problem:

When viewing repositories of a particular product, the sort order is unclear and does not appear to be alphabetic (see attachment).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 * candlepin-0.5.14-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-0.1.200-3.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-certs-tools-1.0.2-2.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-cli-0.1.44-2.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-configure-0.1.55-2.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-httpd-ssl-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-selinux-0.1.3-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-trusted-ssl-cert-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * pulp-0.0.256-1.el6.src.rpm

How reproducible:
 * Seems to happen everytime ... so I may just not understand the default sort order

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a system template
2. In the Eligible Conten pane, select a valid product, such as "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server"
  
Actual results:

 * The list of repositories for a product doesn't appear to be sorted alphabetically.  It seems to mix RHEL5 and RHEL6 in a random order.

Expected results:

 * List of repositories sorted alphabetically

Additional info:

Comment 2 Pavel Pokorny 2012-09-10 02:54:38 EDT

Fixed in e512520

Comment 4 Og Maciel 2012-09-17 19:58:54 EDT

Created attachment 613819 [details]
Screenshot

Comment 5 Og Maciel 2012-09-17 19:59:10 EDT

Verified using:

* candlepin-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* candlepin-selinux-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* candlepin-tomcat6-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* katello-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-all-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* katello-cli-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch
* katello-cli-common-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch
* katello-common-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-configure-1.1.9-3.el6cf.noarch
* katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-common-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-selinux-server-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-12-04 14:41:49 EST

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.