Hide Forgot
Latest upstream release: 6.11 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.9.1 URL: http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/ipset/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
(The history of the wiki page tells me ipset was added to the upstream monitoring either by xosevp or salimma, so I'm adding you both to CC) I find it a bit rude that someone added ipset to the upstream release monitoring without telling me. At the very least, if someone is interested in the package, I would have expected them to talk to me and eventually become a co-maintainer. Anyway, I'll try to do the update soon, probably next week. Again, if you are interested in the package, I'll be more than happy to give you the ACLs in PackageDB. :)
It was me, as you can see from the page history: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Upstream_release_monitoring&action=historysubmit&diff=269296&oldid=269287 but I'm not the person being rude; ipset was in the "Check My Packages, Please!" section (see the linked diff) and, assuming that people don't just list other people's packages there, I assumed one of the (co-)maintainers did, and just cleared it up. Sorry for the misunderstanding, though.
(In reply to comment #1) > I find it a bit rude that someone added ipset to the upstream release > monitoring without telling me. Rude? Your current work as maintainer is to keep the package updated. Anyway, you can put your name here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring#Package_Owner_Ignore_List and you won't get any bug comming from upstream-release-monitoring. -thanks-
changelog: 6.11 - Support hostnames and service names with dash - Exceptions support added to hash:*net* types - Log warning when a hash type of set gets full - Set types moved into libipset library - Library map file added in order to support library versioning - doc: Linux 2.6.39 already has the defs (Jan Engelhardt) - build: install libipset in the right place (Jan Engelhardt) - Provide a pkgconfig file (Jan Engelhardt) - build: make distcheck work and use POSIX mode for tarball generation (Jan Engelhardt) - build: install libipset/linux_ip_set_list.h (Jan Engelhardt) - build: include libipset/nfproto.h (Jan Engelhardt) - build: process include/libipset/ (Jan Engelhardt) - build: use AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR and stash away tools (Jan Engelhardt) - Update .gitignore (Jan Engelhardt) 6.10 - Tests added to check ICMP/ICMPv6 type/code parsing - ICMP/ICMPv6 type/code parser bug fixed (bug reported by Sabitov) - ipset: fix lookup of tcp port names (Stephen Hemminger) - Optionally disable building the kernel module (Mathieu Bridon) - Make tidy complete
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > I find it a bit rude that someone added ipset to the upstream release > > monitoring without telling me. > > Rude? Your current work as maintainer is to keep the package updated. No, my job as a maintainer is to keep the package maintained. There is no obligation to always update. And yes, I find it rude to add packages maintained by others in an opt-in mechanism without consulting them. > Anyway, you can put your name here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring#Package_Owner_Ignore_List > and you won't get any bug comming from upstream-release-monitoring. No. The same page you quote even says: Please only add your own packages here! If you are not the maintainer or co-maintainer of a package, please do not add it here unless you were explicitly requested to do so by a maintainer/co-maintainer. This means that this is an opt-in service, and maintainers should be the ones opting in. I can understand that you have an interest in a package, but the least you can do is to ask the maintainers whether they are interested in using the Upstream Release Monitoring. That being said, let's close this tangent. The bug report was about a new version being available, and it's being built on Koji. I'll push updates for Rawhide and Fedora 17.
ipset-6.11-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipset-6.11-1.fc17
Package ipset-6.11-1.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ipset-6.11-1.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4834/ipset-6.11-1.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
ipset-6.11-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.