Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 787096
Review Request: ghc-netlist - A simplified generic netlist for HDLs
Last modified: 2012-02-15 18:53:53 EST
Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-netlist.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: A very simplified and generic netlist designed to be compatible with Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) like Verilog and VHDL.
Successful Koji builds for F15, F16 and F17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3758232 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3758233 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3758238 $ rpmlint ghc-netlist.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ghc-netlist-devel-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-netlist.spec built/ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm built/ghc-netlist-devel-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - NOT OK. API documentation - OK, in devel package. [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. BSD 3clause license [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src/netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz d52ca0981b9fda61b6c29a5130d52c0c ghc-netlist-0.3.1-1.fc15.src/netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz md5sum netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz d52ca0981b9fda61b6c29a5130d52c0c netlist-0.3.1.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64 [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the packages. Works fine. Imported Language.Netlist.AST into ghci. No issues. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED.
Could you change the default description and summary before importing the package?
Yes, will change the default description and summary before importing it. Thanks for the review!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-netlist Short Description: A very simplified and generic netlist for HDLs Owners: shakthimaan Branches: F-15 F-16 F-17 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests). f17 not yet branched.
ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc16
ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc15
ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.
ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
ghc-netlist-0.3.1-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.