Bug 787517 (dawati-artwork) - Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX
Summary: Review Request: dawati-artwork - Artwork for the Dawati UX
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: dawati-artwork
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-05 22:36 UTC by Peter Robinson
Modified: 2012-11-25 15:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-25 15:21:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Robinson 2012-02-05 22:36:05 UTC
SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dawati-artwork.spec
SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dawati-artwork-0.90.6-1.fc17.src.rpm

Description:
The artwork, cursors, icons, backgrounds and sounds for the Dawati UX

koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3763661

Comment 1 Mario Blättermann 2012-08-05 18:19:49 UTC
Successful scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4361345

Some initial comments:

The source file headers of the gtk engine contain the GPLv2, please add it to the license declaration of your package.

Drop libtool from BuildRequires, because it is needed by gnome-common anyway.

%defattr is only needed if you want to provide your package for EPEL <6.


Wouldn't it be better to provide the gtk engine in a separate package, including the gtk2 themes? The other stuff could also go into a noarch subpackage. Moreover, I'm unsure if dawati-backgrounds.xml needs an extra runtime requirement. For now, the binary package needs the following:

libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)  
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)  
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)  
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)  
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)  
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

I'm missing metacity here. Maybe the package should be split into even more subpackages.

Comment 2 Mario Blättermann 2012-08-29 19:10:58 UTC
Any progress with solving the mentioned problems?

Comment 3 Mario Blättermann 2012-09-20 22:21:37 UTC
Just a reminder...

Comment 4 Mario Blättermann 2012-10-20 19:21:40 UTC
Just a reminder, sent out once a month ... as usual.

If you are no longer interested in to work on this package, please let us know.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.