Bug 79091 – up2date on 2.1AS on itanium connects to channel redhat-advanced-server-i386

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 79091 - up2date on 2.1AS on itanium connects to channel redhat-advanced-server-i386

Summary:	up2date on 2.1AS on itanium connects to channel redhat-advanced-server-i386

Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Network
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	RHN/Backend (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	RHN Devel
Hardware:	ia64 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Todd Sanders
QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-12-05 11:21 EST by Jay Fenlason
Modified:	2014-08-31 19:24 EDT (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-02-12 12:35:19 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jay Fenlason 2002-12-05 11:21:27 EST

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020501

Description of problem:
When I run up2date on an itanium 2 processor, it connects to the
redhat-advanced-server-i386 channel, which is not appropriate for an ia64 processor.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.run up2date
2.enter root password
3.hit Next
	

Additional info:

Comment 1 Adrian Likins 2002-12-13 17:19:23 EST

serer side issue, reassigning there

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-05-03 00:15:41 EDT

User pvetere@redhat.com's account has been closed

Comment 3 Bill C. Riemers 2008-02-12 12:35:19 EST

Which version of RHEL was this with, and is this still an issue?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.