Bug 79113 - [RFE] gnome-cd uses an excessive amount of memory
Summary: [RFE] gnome-cd uses an excessive amount of memory
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: gnome-media
Version: 8.0
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Havoc Pennington
QA Contact: Jay Turner
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-12-05 21:20 UTC by Michael Lee Yohe
Modified: 2015-01-08 00:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-12-05 21:20:55 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Lee Yohe 2002-12-05 21:20:48 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.6 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020830

Description of problem:
For a simple CD player, gnome-cd consumes much more memory than is absolutely
necessary - even for a simple GTK2 application.  gnome-cd, since it is the main
selection for Gnome 2, should have its fat trimmed aggressively.

From top:
32721 myohe     15   0 16040  11M  7284 S     0.5  1.4   6:02 gnome-cd

$ ps ax | grep gnome-cd
32721 ?        S      6:02 gnome-cd
$ cat /proc/32721/status
Name:	gnome-cd
State:	S (sleeping)
Tgid:	32721
Pid:	32721
PPid:	1
TracerPid:	0
Uid:	500	500	500	500
Gid:	500	500	500	500
FDSize:	32
Groups:	500 
VmSize:	   23428 kB
VmLck:	       0 kB
VmRSS:	   11328 kB
VmData:	    8848 kB
VmStk:	      64 kB
VmExe:	     100 kB
VmLib:	   11540 kB
SigPnd:	0000000000000000
SigBlk:	0000000080000000
SigIgn:	8000000000001000
SigCgt:	00000003800104f0
CapInh:	0000000000000000
CapPrm:	0000000000000000
CapEff:	0000000000000000

Oddly enough - upon running memprof on gnome-cd, my system locks up until I kill
(from a virtual terminal) all associated processes to memprof and gnome-cd.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. see description
2.
3.
	

Actual Results:  see description

Expected Results:  see description

Additional info:

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-12-05 21:37:23 UTC
Should report this one on http://bugzilla.gnome.org, presumably involves
fairly pervasive code changes we would not do in a Red Hat specific patch.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.