Hide Forgot
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 Description of problem: With xinetd 2.3.7-4.7x the /etc/xinetd.d/ entries that represent local services start just fine, but the entries that represent redirects do not seem to be recognised. The output from xinetd -d shos that the files are found and read with no extra debug output showing an error. Downgrading to 2.3.3-1 with the same xinfig files in xinetd.d brings the redirects back into service. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.7-4.7x How reproducible: Always Additional info: An xinetd.d file that works under the old version of xinetd, but not the new one. [root@zool root]# cd /etc/xinetd.d/ [root@zool xinetd.d]# cat http # default: off # description: A port forward for http service http { disable = no socket_type = stream protocol = tcp wait = no user = root redirect = 192.168.15.1 80 }
This is a known bug in v2.3.7 and I just got nailed by it this morning when we updated xinetd. Redhat really needs to fix this - all port redirects seem broken with version 2.3.7 See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xinetd&m=102996722420681&w=2 and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xinetd&m=102997330427341&w=2 where other users report this issue We have backed down to v2.3.4 and everything with our redirects is working again
A fix was formally released in 2.3.8 * Reworked redirect to better detect problems in its configuration. Also, redirect now allows service names for port numbers. -Steve Grubb cheers Steve ... and there is now a 2.3.9 (Released 24 Sep 2002) This one will quite probably hurt Red Hat's corporate customers who are trying to use RH7.2/7.3/8.0 as a proxy-firewall platform. It really isn't making Red Hat's QA function look that good.
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-160.html