Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be under maintenance for infrastructure upgrades and will not be available on July 31st between 12:30 AM - 05:30 AM UTC. We appreciate your understanding and patience. You can follow status.redhat.com for details.
Bug 79279 - Blank package name search returns junk on Advanced Search page
Summary: Blank package name search returns junk on Advanced Search page
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Retired
Component: RHN/Web Site
Version: RHN Devel
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Greg DeKoenigsberg
QA Contact: Fanny Augustin
Depends On:
Blocks: 76241
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2002-12-09 14:39 UTC by Matt Jamison
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:48 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-12-10 17:35:15 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Josef Komenda 2002-12-09 14:39:36 UTC
Description of Problem: Should probably limit the package name search to 3
characters as well.

Comment 1 Josef Komenda 2002-12-09 14:45:13 UTC
Also, this may need to be optimized:

Additional comment by cturner@redhat.com on 2002-12-07 14:26:47

package search "works" but it doesn't behave like system search.  it still uses
the old query_into_set instead of the newer datasource-driven mechanism.  rob
and I have cleaned up the system search to be a bit more datasource-friendly. 
the errata and package search need to be done similarly, else we end up with the
same search mishmash we had before.  this should be an easy conversion; rob or I
can help if there are any questions with how we did things.  once that has been
done, I will optimize the queries to improve performance.  one of the problems
with the current search is that it should only store the latest versions of
packages in the set, not store all matches and expect the elaborator to filter
it as it seems to do now.

Comment 2 Chip Turner 2002-12-10 17:35:06 UTC

now if you do a search w/o typing text in, it just takes you to the search page
of the appropriate type.

Comment 3 Josef Komenda 2002-12-10 23:13:39 UTC
Looks good on dev, closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.