Bug 7930 – binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies:

Bug 7930 - binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies:

Summary:	binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies:

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification:	Retired
Component:	kernel (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	1.0
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Michael K. Johnson
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	1999-12-21 11:53 EST by Jaroslaw Sosnicki
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-02-05 01:49:41 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jaroslaw Sosnicki 1999-12-21 11:53:16 EST

I upgraded to release rawhide-release-19991220-1.noarch.rpm
When I try to run upgrade to kernel-utils-2.2.13-0.9.i386.rpm or
memprof-0.3.0-2.i386.rpm I am getting this message:
# rpm -Uvh binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm kernel-utils*rpm memprof*rpm
error: failed dependencies:
        libbfd-2.9.1.0.24.so is needed by kernel-utils-2.2.13-0.9
        libbfd-2.9.1.0.24.so is needed by memprof-0.3.0-2
# rpm -q binutils
binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1

Looks like an old reference in dep. list.

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-12-21 13:01:59 EST

This is a problem with kernel-utils and memprof, not binutils. Both these
packages were built before binutils was upgraded in our build system,
so the dependency in formation is wrong. These problems will be sorted
out as part of doing QA for Red Hat 6.2, but, for now, you probably need to
do little more than recompile from the src.rpm's with the upgraded binutils
installed on your build system.

Comment 2 Jim Kingdon 1999-12-21 16:17:59 EST

Changing component to "kernel" because I don't see a category for
kernel-utils or memprof.  Perhaps someone can think of, or create,
a more appropriate component.

Comment 3 Cristian Gafton 2000-01-04 17:28:59 EST

Assigned to dledford

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2000-02-05 01:49:59 EST

Will be fixed in the kernel in the next raw hide.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.