Bug 7930 - binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies:
Summary: binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies:
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael K. Johnson
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-12-21 16:53 UTC by Jaroslaw Sosnicki
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-02-05 06:49:41 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jaroslaw Sosnicki 1999-12-21 16:53:16 UTC
I upgraded to release rawhide-release-19991220-1.noarch.rpm
When I try to run upgrade to kernel-utils-2.2.13-0.9.i386.rpm or
memprof-0.3.0-2.i386.rpm I am getting this message:
# rpm -Uvh binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1.i386.rpm kernel-utils*rpm memprof*rpm
error: failed dependencies:
        libbfd-2.9.1.0.24.so is needed by kernel-utils-2.2.13-0.9
        libbfd-2.9.1.0.24.so is needed by memprof-0.3.0-2
# rpm -q binutils
binutils-2.9.5.0.22-1

Looks like an old reference in dep. list.

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 1999-12-21 18:01:59 UTC
This is a problem with kernel-utils and memprof, not binutils. Both these
packages were built before binutils was upgraded in our build system,
so the dependency in formation is wrong. These problems will be sorted
out as part of doing QA for Red Hat 6.2, but, for now, you probably need to
do little more than recompile from the src.rpm's with the upgraded binutils
installed on your build system.

Comment 2 Jim Kingdon 1999-12-21 21:17:59 UTC
Changing component to "kernel" because I don't see a category for
kernel-utils or memprof.  Perhaps someone can think of, or create,
a more appropriate component.

Comment 3 Cristian Gafton 2000-01-04 22:28:59 UTC
Assigned to dledford

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2000-02-05 06:49:59 UTC
Will be fixed in the kernel in the next raw hide.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.