Bug 793539 (JBEPP-618) - Docs: Remove step to add jboss negotiation
Summary: Docs: Remove step to add jboss negotiation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: JBEPP-618
Product: JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 5
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 5.1.0.ER03
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.1.0.ER04
Assignee: Scott Mumford
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBE...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: JBEPP-517
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-11-10 20:13 UTC by Thomas Heute
Modified: 2014-06-17 13:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-12 00:46:44 UTC
Type: Task

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBEPP-618 0 Major Closed Docs: Remove step to add jboss negotiation 2013-12-09 14:32:06 UTC

Description Thomas Heute 2010-11-10 20:13:49 UTC 
project_key: JBEPP

Please remove the step:
"
Add the JBoss Negotiation binary by copying PORTAL_SSO/spnego/jboss-negotiation-2.0.3.GA.jar to jboss-as/server/PROFILE/lib.
"
from the documentation. The library is already part of EAP 5.1
Comment 1 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 02:39:34 UTC 
Thomas, would the instruction still be relevant for users on EPP 5.0?
Comment 2 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 06:46:02 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBEPP-517
Comment 3 Thomas Heute 2010-11-11 07:09:06 UTC 
Good question, and the answer is that it should also be removed from Branch 5.0
Comment 4 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 07:23:17 UTC 
I just realised the last sentence of the description says EAP 5.1 (I read it as EPP 5.1).

I'll pull that step out of the doc.

Thanks Thomas
Comment 5 Scott Mumford 2010-11-11 07:23:21 UTC 
I just realised the last sentence of the description says EAP 5.1 (I read it as EPP 5.1).

I'll pull that step out of the doc.

Thanks Thomas
Comment 6 Thomas Heute 2010-11-11 07:35:08 UTC 
But I verified and it was already in EAP 5.0 as well, and should be removed from both versions of the doc
Comment 7 Scott Mumford 2010-11-12 00:46:44 UTC 
Content removed
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.