Hide Forgot
Currently it looks like this: [jwulf@radhe temp]$ csprocessor push -cn Test_Book.spec CSProcessor client version: 0.16.3 Loading configuration from /home/jwulf/.config/csprocessor.ini Web Service at http://csprocessor.cloud.lab.eng.bne.redhat.com:8080/ version: 0.21.2 INFO: The Content Specification is valid. WARN: Note: All descriptions, tags, source urls and writers will be ignored for existing Topics. INFO: The Content Specification saved successfully. Content Specification ID: 6226 Revision: 39655 Really all it needs to be is this: [jwulf@radhe temp]$ csprocessor push -cn Test_Book.spec CSProcessor client 0.16.3 Configuration file: /home/jwulf/.config/csprocessor.ini Server: http://csprocessor.cloud.lab.eng.bne.redhat.com:8080/ version: 0.21.2 Content Specification saved successfully. Content Specification ID: 6226 Revision: 39655 Even then, the first part is verbose. Perhaps the default should be: [jwulf@radhe temp]$ csprocessor push -cn Test_Book.spec Content Specification saved successfully. Content Specification ID: 6226 Revision: 39655 and with -v for verbose: [jwulf@radhe temp]$ csprocessor push -cnv Test_Book.spec CSProcessor client 0.16.3 Configuration file: /home/jwulf/.config/csprocessor.ini Server: http://csprocessor.cloud.lab.eng.bne.redhat.com:8080/ version: 0.21.2 Content Specification saved successfully. Content Specification ID: 6226 Revision: 39655 In which case, a verbose switch in the csprocessor.ini would be a good idea.
The only part I agree with here is removing the "INFO: The Content Specification is valid." message. The others ensure that the user knows what server/configuration they are connecting to. I guess the CSProcessor client message could be removed. The "WARN: Note: All descriptions, tags, source urls and writers will be ignored for existing Topics." is key to ensure that the user knows that those parts will be ignored in their content specification. Anyways I'll try and catch you tomorrow to talk about it.
Update: The WARN message has been removed from version 0.22.0 since tags can be added to existing topics in that version.
Closing because of Lee's last comment.