Bug 797059 - [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add+0x6d/0xa0()
Summary: [abrt] kernel: WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add+0x6d/0xa0()
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 16
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:41a1c499ad509235bb18bb0156a...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-24 06:52 UTC by admin
Modified: 2012-02-28 05:30 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-27 15:43:07 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: smolt_data (3.32 KB, text/plain)
2012-02-24 06:52 UTC, admin
no flags Details

Description admin 2012-02-24 06:52:17 UTC
libreport version: 2.0.8
abrt_version:   2.0.7
cmdline:        BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64 root=UUID=42ce16a9-4662-4c4a-8fb8-57524e5cb0d4 ro rd.md=0 rd.lvm=0 rd.dm=0 quiet SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 rhgb rd.luks=0 KEYTABLE=ru LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
kernel:         3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64
reason:         WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add+0x6d/0xa0()
time:           Пт. 24 февр. 2012 09:05:23

smolt_data:     Binary file, 3402 bytes

backtrace:
:WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add+0x6d/0xa0()
:Hardware name: MS-7641
:list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff8801e5761360), but was ffff880165761360. (next=ffff8801e5761360).
:Modules linked in: ebtable_nat ebtables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat xt_CHECKSUM lockd iptable_mangle bridge fcoe libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc scsi_tgt 8021q garp stp llc be2iscsi iscsi_boot_sysfs bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 cxgb3i libcxgbi cxgb3 mdio ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack vhost_net macvtap macvlan tun virtio_net snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm r8169 sp5100_tco kvm_amd kvm snd_timer snd uinput edac_core edac_mce_amd i2c_piix4 soundcore sunrpc k10temp microcode mii snd_page_alloc lm63 pata_acpi ata_generic pata_atiixp radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
:Pid: 1464, comm: yum Not tainted 3.2.6-3.fc16.x86_64 #1
:Call Trace:
: [<ffffffff8106dd4f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
: [<ffffffff8106de46>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
: [<ffffffff812c9c9d>] __list_add+0x6d/0xa0
: [<ffffffff8119008d>] d_alloc+0x4d/0x60
: [<ffffffff81183acd>] d_alloc_and_lookup+0x2d/0x90
: [<ffffffff81190415>] ? d_lookup+0x35/0x60
: [<ffffffff811860b1>] do_lookup+0x2b1/0x3a0
: [<ffffffff81186e3c>] path_lookupat+0x11c/0x740
: [<ffffffff81183ffb>] ? getname_flags+0x3b/0x260
: [<ffffffff812c3f27>] ? __strncpy_from_user+0x27/0x60
: [<ffffffff81187491>] do_path_lookup+0x31/0xc0
: [<ffffffff81188839>] user_path_at_empty+0x59/0xa0
: [<ffffffff8118e75f>] ? d_delete+0x9f/0x190
: [<ffffffff81163aaf>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x2f/0x110
: [<ffffffff81188891>] user_path_at+0x11/0x20
: [<ffffffff8117daca>] vfs_fstatat+0x3a/0x70
: [<ffffffff8117db1e>] vfs_lstat+0x1e/0x20
: [<ffffffff8117dcba>] sys_newlstat+0x1a/0x40
: [<ffffffff811839f2>] ? path_put+0x22/0x30
: [<ffffffff810cdd22>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x242/0x360
: [<ffffffff815e9982>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Comment 1 admin 2012-02-24 06:52:22 UTC
Created attachment 565509 [details]
File: smolt_data

Comment 2 Josh Boyer 2012-02-24 13:39:04 UTC
Was this on resume from suspend/hibernate?

Comment 3 admin 2012-02-27 05:35:40 UTC
No.
Has restarted system

Comment 4 Dave Jones 2012-02-27 15:43:07 UTC
ffff8801e5761360 became a ffff880165761360  (e -> 6). A single bit got randomly flipped.
This is a sign of memory going bad, or some other hardware fault.

Comment 5 admin 2012-02-28 05:30:22 UTC
With memory everything is all right. memtest some circles of tests have passed without errors. As tried to change memory modules. Results similar. At work with Windows any errors are absent.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.