Bug 797791 - vdsm : Conflicts with vdsm-cli
Summary: vdsm : Conflicts with vdsm-cli
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: vdsm
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Federico Simoncelli
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-27 10:37 UTC by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2013-02-21 12:26 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:35:49 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Schwendt 2012-02-27 10:37:40 UTC
=> vdsm-4.9.3.2-0.fc17.src.rpm
=> vdsm-cli-4.9.3.2-0.fc17.noarch in fedora-development-i386
  File conflict with: vdsm-4.9.3.2-0.fc17.i686
     /usr/share/vdsm/SecureXMLRPCServer.pyc
     /usr/share/vdsm/SecureXMLRPCServer.pyo
     /usr/share/vdsm/vdscli.pyc
     /usr/share/vdsm/vdscli.pyo

[semi-automated bug report]

Comment 1 Federico Simoncelli 2013-02-21 10:35:49 UTC
We didn't have any other report about this in an year. The problem was most likely a package conflict between different repositories. Feel free to reopen adding more information (e.g. what repositories you are using) if you still experience the issue.

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2013-02-21 11:45:14 UTC
D'oh! Every details you would need was present in the ticket when it was opened. Even the repo name.

You could have asked _much_ earlier in case you didn't understand the report.

A year later, the files in the packages have been moved or replaced. It may be that this has resolved the conflict. A future run of the conflicts checker will tell.

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2013-02-21 11:46:50 UTC
And no, it was not "a package conflict between different repositories". It was a solely a conflict between subpackages built from the vdsm src.rpm. All details have been in the ticket.

Comment 4 Federico Simoncelli 2013-02-21 12:26:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> And no, it was not "a package conflict between different repositories". It
> was a solely a conflict between subpackages built from the vdsm src.rpm. All
> details have been in the ticket.

This has been resolved in vdsm-4.10.0-7.fc17 moving the files into a separate subpackage called vdsm-python.
This bug was never reported (other than from you) as there's no kvm support on i686 and vdsm-cli-4.9.3.2-0.fc17.noarch wasn't conflicting with vdsm-4.9.3.2-0.fc17.x86_64.

Than you for reporting the bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.