Bug 798202 - Review Request: python-ldappool - A connection pool for python-ldap
Summary: Review Request: python-ldappool - A connection pool for python-ldap
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael S.
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-28 09:57 UTC by Haïkel Guémar
Modified: 2012-04-12 03:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc17
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-12 03:44:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
misc: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Haïkel Guémar 2012-02-28 09:57:25 UTC
Spec URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool.spec
SRPM URL: http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool-1.0-0.src.rpm
Description: A simple connector pool for python-ldap.

The pool keeps LDAP connectors alive and let you reuse them,
drastically reducing the time spent to initiate a ldap connection.

------

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint -iv python-ldappool-1.0-0.src.rpm
python-ldappool.src: I: checking
python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/mozilla-services/ldappool (timeout 10 seconds)
python-ldappool.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ldappool-1.0.tar.gz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.

$ rpmlint -iv python-ldappool-1.0-0.noarch.rpm
python-ldappool.noarch: I: checking
python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-ldappool.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/mozilla-services/ldappool (timeout 10 seconds)

-----------
scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3826278

Comment 1 Michael S. 2012-03-24 06:40:42 UTC
Is the package for EPEL ? 

( as there is BuildRoot and %clean ) 

Also :
- BuildRequires on python-devel should say what version of python need to be used
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires

- the license should be in %doc, and since there is no lincese upstream, you should ask upstream to add it

- the snippet for %python_sitelib is likely uneeded ( unless need to be pushed to EPEL )

- there is no %dist in the release

- if the source cannot be downloaded, packager should give instruction on how to do it 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs

- there is no %check to run the tests

- the source code speak of having a license GPL or LGPL or MPL, so triple license.

Comment 2 Haïkel Guémar 2012-03-24 09:18:55 UTC
1. i'm dropping EPEL (I lack motivation to maintain these branches)
2. fixed since i'm dropping EPEL
3. ticket submitted: https://github.com/mozilla-services/ldappool/issues/2
4. fixed since i'm dropping EPEL
5. fixed
6. fixed
7. since it requires an LDAP server (installed and configured), not planned to do so in the near future
8. fixed

new spec and src.rpm:
http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool.spec
http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc16.src.rpm

Comment 3 Michael S. 2012-03-24 10:04:54 UTC
- Since the package is noarch, this line is useless :
export CFLAGS="%{optflags}"

- you should use %global, not %define ( first line of the spec )

I am rebuilding it in mock and testing it, so the review should be quick once these 2 items are fixed

Comment 4 Haïkel Guémar 2012-03-24 10:39:53 UTC
My bad, these two bummers are fixed
new spec and src.rpm:
http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool.spec
http://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc16.src.rpm

Comment 5 Michael S. 2012-03-24 10:52:11 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated



==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
     least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: No licenses found! Please check the source files for licenses
     manually.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc18.noarch.rpm

python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


rpmlint python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc18.src.rpm

python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
/home/misc/checkout/git/FedoraReview/src/798202/ldappool-1.0.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package     : 2f2f9ca14dc36b432d2acd379d196062
  MD5SUM upstream package : 2f2f9ca14dc36b432d2acd379d196062

[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
     /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
     --requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
     upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
     Note: %define srcname ldappool


==== Python ====
[x]: MUST Module list python2-devel or python3-devel as BuildRequires
[x]: MUST Python egg is built from source

Issues:
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc18.noarch.rpm

python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
python-ldappool.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


rpmlint python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc18.src.rpm

python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
python-ldappool.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap, leap, dapple
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint


Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0git
External plugins:


The 2 rpmlint errors are false positive, and i tested that the package work ( ie import fine ), so the package is good to go.

You can request the git entry.

Comment 6 Haïkel Guémar 2012-03-24 11:39:21 UTC
Thanks for the review !

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-ldappool 
Short Description: A connection pool for python-ldap
Owners: hguemar
Branches: f15 f16 f17
InitialCC:

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-03-24 18:42:43 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-03-26 18:20:31 UTC
python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc17

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-03-28 05:55:13 UTC
python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-04-12 03:44:21 UTC
python-ldappool-1.0-0.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.