Bug 799075 - Fix setting of bio flags
Summary: Fix setting of bio flags
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jeff Moyer
QA Contact: Gris Ge
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 809377
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-01 18:02 UTC by Jeff Moyer
Modified: 2012-06-20 08:32 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel-2.6.32-250.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 08:32:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0862 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 kernel security, bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-20 12:55:00 UTC

Description Jeff Moyer 2012-03-01 18:02:36 UTC
Description of problem:
The BIO_ definitions are meant to be ored into the bi_flags field like so:
bio->bi_flags |= (1<<BIO_*);
There are a couple of places in the upstream kernel that get this wrong, doing instead:
bio->bi_flags |= BIO_*;

In RHEL 6, there is only one such issue.  Note that in RHEL 6 we have convenience macros for discard flush and fua (BIO_DISCARD, BIO_FLUSH, BIO_FUA), which already do the bit shifting.

Initially reported upstream here:
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/87487f9987731480/da7877b036bfac34?show_docid=da7877b036bfac34&pli=1


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-03-01 18:09:37 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has 
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed 
products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release.

Comment 4 Aristeu Rozanski 2012-03-07 14:55:15 UTC
Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-250.el6

Comment 8 Gris Ge 2012-05-02 06:59:13 UTC
All storage-qe test show no issue for this bug in Beta testing.

VERIFY.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 08:32:50 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0862.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.