RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 799193 - Update nspr to 4.9
Summary: Update nspr to 4.9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: nspr
Version: 6.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 6.3
Assignee: Elio Maldonado Batiz
QA Contact: Aleš Mareček
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 798988 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 798539 798988 799192
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-02 05:43 UTC by Elio Maldonado Batiz
Modified: 2012-06-20 07:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: nspr-4.9-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No Documentation Needed
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 07:24:15 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
These are the changes I made while rebasing in the for of a patch (10.06 KB, patch)
2012-03-05 15:38 UTC, Elio Maldonado Batiz
no flags Details | Diff
Changes actually applied in patch form (8.46 KB, patch)
2012-03-05 21:16 UTC, Elio Maldonado Batiz
rrelyea: review-
Details | Diff
Changes to rebase nspr to 4.9 since last build (2.74 KB, patch)
2012-03-06 06:06 UTC, Elio Maldonado Batiz
rrelyea: review-
Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0973 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: nss, nss-util, and nspr security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2012-06-19 19:28:14 UTC

Description Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-03-02 05:43:18 UTC
Description of problem: We have updated nss to 3.13.1 and shipped it with nspr 4.8.9. This is too old for the 3.13 line. Due to an upstream miss-communication nss 13.3 was released with NSS_4_9_BETA4. This has been rectified and NSS_4_9_RTM  is now released. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info: This update is required in order to update nss to 3.13.3

Comment 2 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-03-05 15:33:36 UTC
The bug fixes in NSPR 4.8.9 can be found with this Bugzilla query:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=1088474&resolution=FIXED&classification=Components&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=4.8.9&product=NSPR

Besides adding a function to obtain version of NSPR at runtime, the chages are fixes intended for palforms other than Linux ones.

Th fiies in NSPR 4.9 are
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?resolution=FIXED;classification=Components;query_format=advanced;target_milestone=4.9;product=NSPR;list_id=2533440

Of interest are: 
Add PR macro for maximum 64 bit value
Add PR_INT64 and PR_UINT64 macros for portable 64-bit integer constants.

Comment 3 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-03-05 15:38:27 UTC
Created attachment 567671 [details]
These are the changes I made while rebasing in the for of a patch

Updated existing patches to account for code movements for they otherwise do the same as before. Hardly anything had to be done.

Comment 5 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-03-05 21:16:55 UTC
Created attachment 567759 [details]
Changes actually applied in patch form

Comment 6 Bob Relyea 2012-03-06 01:58:39 UTC
Comment on attachment 567759 [details]
Changes actually applied in patch form

This is a diff with a *very* old version of NSPR, not the latest.

NOTE: the latest version in RHEL 6.3 is 4.8.9-3. This looks like it was merged with 4.8.9-2

Comment 7 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-03-06 06:06:24 UTC
Created attachment 567840 [details]
Changes to rebase nspr to 4.9 since last build

That previous build which I am comparing against is effectively the same, results-wise, as the one for rhel 6.2.z that was sent out.

Comment 8 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-03-07 02:40:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> 
> That previous build which I am comparing against is effectively the same,
> results-wise, as the one for rhel 6.2.z that was sent out.

No, the latest version in RHEL 6.3 is 4.8.9-2 and it is RHEL6.2.z that has a 
4.8.9-3 entry.

'rhpkg --branches nspr' brings them in separate directories so one can examine 
the both spec files and compare. 

Looking at the most recent entries in the %changelog for each:

----------------------------------------------------------------
For RHEL 6.3 we have
%changelog
* Thu Mar 01 2012 Elio Maldonado <emaldona> - 4.9-1
- Resolves: rhbz#799193 - Update to 4.9

* Wed Jan 18 2012 Elio Maldonado <emaldona> - 4.8.9-2
- Related: Bug 744069 - Avoid %%post/un shell invocations and dependencies.

* Wed Jan 18 2012 elio maldonado <emaldona> - 4.8.9-1
- Resolves: Bug 744069 - Rebase nspr to 4.8.9 or higher

* Fri Jul 22 2011 Elio Maldonado <emaldona> - 4.8.8-3
- Add partial RELRO support as a security enhancement...

-----------------------------------------------------------------
and for RHEL-6.2 we have:
%changelog
* Mon Jan 30 2012 Elio Maldonado <emaldona> - 4.8.9-3
- Resolves: 784489,CVE-2011-3389
- Add partial RELRO support as a security enhancement

* Sun Jan 29 2012 Elio Maldonado Batiz <emaldona> - 4.8.9-2
- Resolves: 784489,CVE-2011-3389
- Update to 3.13.1
- Run the nspr test suite in the %%check section

* Wed Sep 07 2011 Elio Maldonado <emaldona> - 4.8.7-2
- Update to 4.8.8

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I downloaded the nspr-debuginfo rpms from each and extracted them with
'rpmdev-extract path-to-the-srpm' and saw identical sources. The spec files look different, but once all patches have been applied with 'rpkg prep' I end up with the same results.

Comment 9 Bob Relyea 2012-03-09 00:58:17 UTC
Comment on attachment 567840 [details]
Changes to rebase nspr to 4.9 since last build

This is the nss patch, not nspr patch.

I pulled both the z-stream .src.rpm and the current candidate 6.3 rpm and did a diff of the specs and the source.

Other than the desired patch, the only other changes to the source were ifdefs for iOS and Android, so r+ for this build for 6.3 and z-stream from me.

Comment 11 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2012-03-28 15:03:17 UTC
*** Bug 798988 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2012-04-26 18:42:59 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No Documentation Needed

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 07:24:15 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0973.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.