Bug 800336 - chkconfig vsftpd on / off does not work
Summary: chkconfig vsftpd on / off does not work
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 801294
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vsftpd
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Skala
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 800407 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-06 10:48 UTC by Petr Sklenar
Modified: 2014-11-09 22:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-08 14:58:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Petr Sklenar 2012-03-06 10:48:15 UTC 
Description of problem:
chkconfig vsftpd on / off does not work

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.0 Alpha1 (Maipo)

How reproducible:
deterministic

Steps to Reproduce:
# chkconfig vsftpd on
error reading information on service vsftpd: No such file or directory
# chkconfig vsftpd off
error reading information on service vsftpd: No such file or directory
# rpm -q vsftpd
vsftpd-2.3.4-5.el7.x86_64


Actual results:
chkconfig vsftpd on/off does NOT work 

Expected results:
chkconfig vsftpd on/off does work 

Additional info:
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2012-03-06 16:58:48 UTC 
That's not the service name.
Comment 2 Petr Sklenar 2012-03-07 08:37:40 UTC 
vsftpd should be name of the service.
service vsftpd start/stop/status work on rhel6, not on rhel7.

chkconfig vsftpd [on|off] works on rhel6.

rpm -ql vsftpd-2.3.4-5.el7.x86_64 | grep sbin
/usr/sbin/vsftpd

binary name is vsftpd
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2012-03-07 16:14:30 UTC 
You are free to make that argument with the vsftpd maintainer, but it's not a chkconfig problem.
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2012-03-07 22:00:56 UTC 
*** Bug 800407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2012-03-08 14:58:22 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 801294 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.