Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 801431

Summary: [RFE] sudo: send username and uid while requesting default options
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Dmitri Pal <dpal>
Component: sssdAssignee: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee <kbanerje>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.3CC: grajaiya, jgalipea, nikolai.kondrashov, prc
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.9.1-1.el6 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Do not document.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:21:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dmitri Pal 2012-03-08 14:19:54 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1239

Sudo client sends two synchronous requests to sssd:
1. for default options providing none information (sss_sudo_send_recv_defaults())
2. for user rules providing username (sss_sudo_send_recv())

This can end up in mixing sudoers from two domains:
1. we have domains A, B (both sudo enabled) and user X@B
2. X@B does sudo
3. sudo requests default options - we will return cn=defaults from A
4. sudo requests rule for X - we will return rules from B

We should send username and uid in sss_sudo_send_recv_defaults(). Then find the domain the user is a member of and return this domain name to sudo.

Sudo will then request the rules giving us username, uid and domain.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:13:18 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-11 02:04:51 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 4 Nikolai Kondrashov 2013-01-08 14:36:56 UTC
Verified manually as fixed with the following packages:

libsss_idmap-1.9.2-59.el6.x86_64
sssd-client-1.9.2-59.el6.x86_64
sudo-1.8.6p3-6.el6.x86_64
sssd-1.9.2-59.el6.x86_64
libsss_sudo-1.9.2-59.el6.x86_64

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:21:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0508.html