Bug 80237 - uic: relocation error: uic: undefined symbol: _ZTI7QGArray
Summary: uic: relocation error: uic: undefined symbol: _ZTI7QGArray
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: qt   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: athlon
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ngo Than
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-12-23 01:32 UTC by Petri T. Koistinen
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:49 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-12-30 14:41:11 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petri T. Koistinen 2002-12-23 01:32:32 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
[petri@dsl-hkigw4e42 petri]$ uic
uic: relocation error: uic: undefined symbol: _ZTI7QGArray
[petri@dsl-hkigw4e42 petri]$ which uic
/usr/bin/uic
[petri@dsl-hkigw4e42 petri]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/uic
qt-devel-3.0.5-17


Additional info:

Comment 1 Ngo Than 2002-12-30 13:43:15 UTC
Hmm, it looks like you have installed wrong glibc/libstdc++ rpm. Please install
the glibc and libstc++ rpm from 8.0.



Comment 2 Petri T. Koistinen 2002-12-30 13:46:55 UTC
What? How do make such accusations? I have not!

[petri@dsl-hkigw4e42 petri]$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.2.93-5
[petri@dsl-hkigw4e42 petri]$ rpm -q libstdc++
libstdc++-3.2-7
[petri@dsl-hkigw4e42 petri]$ 

Comment 3 Ngo Than 2002-12-30 14:41:11 UTC
It could be that you still have old version of qt on your system. You
should please check it again. 

Perhaps you should reinstall glibc/qt/libstdc++ from 8.0 with --force.

i cannot reproduce this problem on many machines with 8.0 here.
And i don't think it's a bug in 8.0.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.