Bug 804813 - repo type "nfsiso" unsupported (mount: unknown filesystem type 'nfsiso')
Summary: repo type "nfsiso" unsupported (mount: unknown filesystem type 'nfsiso')
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dracut
Version: 17
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Will Woods
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: AcceptedBlocker
Depends On:
Blocks: F17Beta, F17BetaBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-19 20:14 UTC by Dr. Tilmann Bubeck
Modified: 2012-04-04 21:44 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-04 21:44:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dr. Tilmann Bubeck 2012-03-19 20:14:36 UTC
Description of problem:

If I use repo=nfsiso:10.2.1.1:/home/install/fedora/17/x86-64/iso on PXE then the installation stops with "mount: unknown filesystem type 'nfsiso'"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora-17-Beta-TC2-x86_64-DVD.iso

How reproducible:
Any time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot PXE
2. Give boot argument repo=nfsiso:10.2.1.1:/home/install/fedora/17/x86-64/iso
  
Actual results:
Above error message

Expected results:
Mounting ISO image and installing


Additional info:

Comment 1 Harald Hoyer 2012-03-20 11:44:27 UTC
does it work with "nfs://" ?

Comment 2 Dr. Tilmann Bubeck 2012-03-20 12:08:36 UTC
yes.

Comment 3 Will Woods 2012-03-20 12:59:11 UTC
Should be fixed in anaconda git, f17-branch:
  8d5d4b9 dracut: fix anaconda-netroot for inst.repo=nfsiso:..

Comment 4 Kamil Páral 2012-03-20 13:23:51 UTC
Proposing as Beta blocker.
"The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Beta_Release_Criteria

Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2012-03-21 21:57:10 UTC
This should be fixed by:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dracut-017-59.git20120321.fc17



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2012-03-21 22:55:22 UTC
+1 blocker

Comment 7 Jared Smith 2012-03-21 23:05:27 UTC
+1 blocker

Comment 8 Adam Williamson 2012-03-21 23:11:27 UTC
I'm +1 as well, 4 +1s (counting Kamil's proposal), accepted per criterion "The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and NFS remote package source options" - nfsiso is one of the two NFS cases.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 9 Bruno Wolff III 2012-03-22 02:27:00 UTC
+0 blocker (it sounds like there is and easy work around) +1 NTH

Comment 10 Adam Williamson 2012-03-24 16:17:54 UTC
We have a new enough dracut in Beta RC1, can someone re-test? thanks!



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 11 Dr. Tilmann Bubeck 2012-03-24 20:24:42 UTC
Works for me in Beta RC1.

Comment 12 Adam Williamson 2012-03-24 20:55:48 UTC
Excellent. The new dracut is stable, so let's close this.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 13 Dr. Tilmann Bubeck 2012-04-04 18:34:20 UTC
The bug appears (again) in Beta RC3. Same error as stated intially:

"mount: unknown filesystem type 'nfsiso'"

But there is no workaround by using repo type "nfs" instead of "nfsiso". It fails too.

Comment 14 Adam Williamson 2012-04-04 21:14:03 UTC
I disagree. I've successfully tested both repo=nfsiso:192.168.1.x:/fedora and repo=nfs:192.168.1.x:/fedora installs. What parameter did you use exactly? What image are you testing with?



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 15 Adam Williamson 2012-04-04 21:28:33 UTC
Did you use PXE during your test, or not?



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 16 Adam Williamson 2012-04-04 21:32:12 UTC
Actually, we think this is almost certainly the same as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810005 . There's a bug with parameter splitting when the repo= parameter is handled early because it's needed to find stage2. There is a workaround described in that bug - pass a root= parameter as well as a repo= parameter.

Comment 17 Adam Williamson 2012-04-04 21:44:44 UTC
Discussed at 2012-04-04 go/no-go meeting. We agreed that we're pretty sure Till's case is #810005, and two other testers (myself and j_dulaney) confirm that nfsiso works fine with a DVD/netinst boot, so this bug should be closed again, and Till can follow up in #810005. thanks!



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.