Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//logback.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//logback-1.0.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Logback is intended as a successor to the popular log4j project. At present time, logback is divided into three modules, logback-core, logback-classic and logback-access. The logback-core module lays the groundwork for the other two modules. The logback-classic module can be assimilated to a significantly improved version of log4j. Moreover, logback-classic natively implements the SLF4J API so that you can readily switch back and forth between logback and other logging frameworks such as log4j or java.util.logging (JUL). The logback-access module integrates with Servlet containers, such as Tomcat and Jetty, to provide HTTP-access log functionality. Note that you could easily build your own module on top of logback-core.
This package got retired from Fedora when I didn't have time to maintain it. I now have time again and would like to get it re-added.
Created attachment 571756 [details] build.log from local mock build Here's a build.log from a local Rawhide mock build with the additional dependencies added to the buildroot
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 806678 ***
*** Bug 806678 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I'll take it.
I'll proceed once the janino package is fixed and available in Rawhide.
Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint SPECS/logback.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/logback-1.0.1-1.fc17.src.rpm logback.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/logback-1.0.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm logback.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency tomcat-lib logback.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US logback.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/logback-1.0.1/manual/images/chapters/appenders/appender.uml logback.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/logback-1.0.1/manual/images/chapters/appenders/appender.~ml 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. This can be ommited, fals-positive. [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1]. [x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2]. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [x] Buildroot definition is not present [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines[3,4]. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2 or EPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 43540f6b3e8f30c7aa1f59fa7db8b6c9 MD5SUM upstream package: 43540f6b3e8f30c7aa1f59fa7db8b6c9 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5]. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with good reason [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore) [x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mixing) [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks) [x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils [x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils [-] Package uses %global not %define [-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...) [x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building [x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details) [x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap === Maven === [x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms [-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a comment [-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven.local.depmap.file=*" explain why it's needed in a comment [x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro === Other suggestions === [x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac) [x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary [x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible) [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4044336 ================ *** APPROVED *** ================
Package change request ======================= Package Name: logback Short Description: A Java logging library Owners: mef Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: java-sig
Misformatted request, please use the template. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Thanks!
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: logback New Branches: f17 Owners: mef InitialCC: java-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests). Unretired devel and f15, added f16.
Hi Mary, any chance to kick a build for F17/Rawhide?
logback-1.0.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/logback-1.0.1-1.fc17
logback-1.0.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
Would you mind to ship it for F16 too?
logback depends on janino, which is currently in updates-testing on F16 (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7565). Once that package makes it to stable, I'll build logback for F16 as well.
logback-1.0.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/logback-1.0.1-1.fc16
logback-1.0.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
logback-1.0.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.