Bug 8073 – Missing gpg key

Bug 8073 - Missing gpg key

Summary:	Missing gpg key

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	sharutils (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Preston Brown
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	1999-12-30 17:20 EST by orders1
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-01-13 21:41:28 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description orders1 1999-12-30 17:20:13 EST

sharutils-4.2.1-1.6.1.i386.rpm is not signed by Redhat gpg key.
Don't know about other architectures.

Comment 1 cobbe 1999-12-31 11:55:59 EST

The corresponding SRPM isn't signed either.

Comment 2 Aleksey Nogin 2000-01-03 16:04:59 EST

Also, sharutils-4.2.1-1.5.2.i386.rpm isn't signed.

I noticed, that this problem (unsigned packages in updates) occurs quite often.
Do you think it would make sense to write a script that checks all the packages
submitted to updates for being properly signed?

Comment 3 berv01 2000-01-04 23:42:59 EST

What I noticed was that the md5sum from the package (sharutils-4.2.1-1.6.1) did
not match the one on the advisory web page, at least for the i386 and SRPMS. I
wonder what caused this...

Comment 4 Preston Brown 2000-01-13 21:41:59 EST

this has been fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.