Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 8073 - Missing gpg key
Missing gpg key
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: sharutils (Show other bugs)
6.1
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Preston Brown
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 1999-12-30 17:20 EST by orders1
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-01-13 21:41:28 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description orders1 1999-12-30 17:20:13 EST 
sharutils-4.2.1-1.6.1.i386.rpm is not signed by Redhat gpg key.
Don't know about other architectures.
Comment 1 cobbe 1999-12-31 11:55:59 EST 
The corresponding SRPM isn't signed either.
Comment 2 Aleksey Nogin 2000-01-03 16:04:59 EST 
Also, sharutils-4.2.1-1.5.2.i386.rpm isn't signed.

I noticed, that this problem (unsigned packages in updates) occurs quite often.
Do you think it would make sense to write a script that checks all the packages
submitted to updates for being properly signed?
Comment 3 berv01 2000-01-04 23:42:59 EST 
What I noticed was that the md5sum from the package (sharutils-4.2.1-1.6.1) did
not match the one on the advisory web page, at least for the i386 and SRPMS. I
wonder what caused this...
Comment 4 Preston Brown 2000-01-13 21:41:59 EST 
this has been fixed.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.