Bug 80761 - incorrect FontName in n019003l.pfb
Summary: incorrect FontName in n019003l.pfb
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: urw-fonts
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ngo Than
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-12-30 23:43 UTC by Vladimir Volovich
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:49 UTC (History)
0 users

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2005-02-23 16:47:20 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vladimir Volovich 2002-12-30 23:43:43 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
the font n019003l.pfb contains incorrect FontName:
/FontName /NimbusSansL-Regu def
instead of
/FontName /NimbusSanL-Regu def
as it did previously, and as the sorresponding AFM file still contains.

This incompatible font name change affects a lot of software which relies on
established font names of the standard URW fonts.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.cd /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1
2.grep -a FontName n019003l.*

    

Actual Results:  n019003l.afm:FontName NimbusSanL-Regu
n019003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSansL-Regu def



Expected Results:  n019003l.afm:FontName NimbusSanL-Regu
n019003l.pfb:/FontName /NimbusSanL-Regu def


Additional info:

please verify that the the fontnames are correct in all other fonts,
because it was reported that there may be some other inconsistencies, see
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-vtex/2002-December/000073.html

Comment 1 Ngo Than 2005-02-23 16:47:20 UTC
it's fixed in urw-fonts-2.2-6 in FC3.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.