Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 807867
Review Request: python-mdp - A modular toolkit for data processing in Python
Last modified: 2016-03-08 15:31:29 EST
Spec URL: http://www.filedropper.com/python-mdp_1
SRPM URL: http://www.filedropper.com/python-mdp-32-1fc16src
Description: MPD provides a Python toolkit for developing data processing sequences and feed-forward network architectures. As a modular framework, it can
easily be extended to incorporate new algorithms which can then be
integrated into the rest of the library.
This package provides a module to use a number of different data processing algorithms in Python2/3 . As far as I can tell is is not currently packaged for either Fedora or Redhat (although packages exist for gentoo, debian, ubuntu, mandriva, pclinux os) and the package is present on the package maintainers wishlist 
From the upstream site the code runs on either python 3 or python 2 depending on which is detected when it is built. I have therefore included the relevant macros depending on whether the package is built with python3. There is only one strict dependency (numpy or python3-numpy)
Since MDP now ships with bidirectional data processing support in the same source I have put this in a sub package (either python-bimdp or python3-bimdp), they can be used exclusively or in combination by users.
I have also posted a message to the upstream mailing list with a reference to this bug report.
RPMS and MD5s built with Koji
(In reply to comment #0)
> Spec URL: http://www.filedropper.com/python-mdp_1
> SRPM URL: http://www.filedropper.com/python-mdp-32-1fc16src
They are gone. Please reupload.
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Spec URL: http://www.filedropper.com/python-mdp_1
> > SRPM URL: http://www.filedropper.com/python-mdp-32-1fc16src
> They are gone. Please reupload.
Don't use such terrible file hosters. Use Dropbox or anything similar which allows to download the files directly by clicking the links.
Moreover, you are not in the Package Maintainers group. Please add FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the "Blocks" field. If you don't want to be sponsored to become a package maintainer, let us know, then we close this review request as FE-DEADREVIEW and free it for other packagers.
We've got no answer from the review requestor for more than half a year. I'll close this now as FE-DEADREVIEW.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1315871 ***