Bug 81068 – njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm fails to build on phoebe

Bug 81068 - njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm fails to build on phoebe

Summary:	njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm fails to build on phoebe

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Public Beta
Classification:	Retired
Component:	njamd (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	phoebe
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-01-03 18:14 EST by Glen A. Foster
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-01-06 09:09:50 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Output of "rpmbuild -ba" (21.26 KB, text/plain) 2003-01-03 18:15 EST, Glen A. Foster	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Glen A. Foster 2003-01-03 18:14:47 EST

Description of Problem: SSIA.  Performing a re-build of njamd from the SRPM
fails on an everything install of "phoebe".  Build log is attached.
 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# ls -l njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       283893 Dec 17 13:25 njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm
# md5sum njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm
8d34aeb6bac25d566d5b6e5b26ac4083  njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm
 
How Reproducible: always (100%)
 
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Phoebe "everything" install
2. rpm -Uvh {distdir}/SRPMS/njamd-0.9.2-6.src.rpm
3. rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/njamd.spec
 
Actual Results:
Out of "rpmbuild -ba" is attached
 
Expected Results:
Successful build

Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-01-03 18:15:14 EST

Created attachment 89115 [details]
Output of "rpmbuild -ba"

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2003-01-06 09:09:50 EST

Upgrade glibc (and glibc-devel).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.