Bug 811801 - popt has problems with unicode characters
Summary: popt has problems with unicode characters
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: popt
Version: 19
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert Scheck
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-12 01:57 UTC by Christoph Anton Mitterer
Modified: 2013-11-24 18:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-24 18:16:15 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Debian BTS 666430 0 None None None Never

Description Christoph Anton Mitterer 2012-04-12 01:57:30 UTC
Hi.

Popt has apparently problems with unicode characters.
I tried to include some in the descrip and argDescrip field of the
option table, e.g.
- either directly "foo“”bar"
- or escaped "foo\u201c\u201dbar"
and then using the auto help functionallity.

popt reacts quite strangely sometimes it justs works and the characters
are printed correctly, sometimes it however skips the unicode characters
and all between them, but not necessarily for all the unicode characters used
ie.
"\u201cfoo\u201d bar \u201cbaz\u201d"
may become
bar “bar”
when printed.


Cheers,
Chris.

Comment 1 Fedora End Of Life 2013-04-03 17:17:54 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle.
Changing version to '19'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2013-11-24 16:33:29 UTC
I am very sorry, but I do really not see how I could help here as Fedora is
downstream of popt. But http://rpm5.org/community/popt-devel/0268.html is a
forward of this request to upstream for discussions there.

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2013-11-24 18:16:15 UTC
Upstream replied to this at http://rpm5.org/community/popt-devel/0280.html -
from my point of view, there is nothing left thus I am closing this report.
In case you disagree with me, feel free to subscribe popt-devel mailing list
at upstream and let us discuss your point directly with upstream.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.