RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 815363 - RFE: Add Reply to List to toolbar
Summary: RFE: Add Reply to List to toolbar
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: evolution
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: beta
: 6.4
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 883010
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-23 13:20 UTC by David Jaša
Modified: 2014-01-02 10:47 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: evolution-2.32.3-2.el6
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 05:05:14 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
evo patch (528 bytes, patch)
2012-04-24 10:50 UTC, Milan Crha
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2013:1540 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: evolution security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2013-11-21 00:40:51 UTC

Description David Jaša 2012-04-23 13:20:00 UTC
Description of problem:
users are not aware of Reply Group evolution feature because it is accessible only via menu or keyboard shortcut. Adding it to toolbar would make it a lot more visible.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-2.28.3-25.2.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2012-04-24 10:50:01 UTC
Created attachment 579821 [details]
evo patch

for evolution;

The Mail view tool bar looks like this with the patch:
   [ Reply ][ Reply to All ][ Reply to List ][ Forward ]
Only the Reply to List doesn't have an icon, thus it's text-only entry there. Making it the same as is in 3.4.0 is undoable currently (or at least not that straightforward like with gtk+).

You can apply the patch to your toolbar definition file at
   /usr/share/evolution/2.28/ui/
too, though as soon as you install any update of evolution package the change will be overwritten. I would say this is not a big issue, and as this can be changed from outside I would just leave here this patch and close the bug.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:35:08 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:09:22 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2012-12-14 07:07:41 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 5 Milan Crha 2013-05-09 18:44:10 UTC
This is also addressed in 2.32.3, thus I add this as a dependency on the rebase bug.

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 05:05:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1540.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.